Tim Neumann1, Claudia Spies. 1. Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Universitaetsmedizin-Berlin Charité, Charité Campus Mitte Berlin, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Biomedical markers may provide additive objective information in screening and confirmation of acute or recent consumption, intoxication, relapse, heavy drinking, hazardous/harmful use/abuse and dependence and alcohol use related organ dysfunction (alcohol use-related disorders: AUDs). AIMS: To review the use of biomarkers in clinical practice to detect AUDs. FINDINGS: About one-fifth of the patients seen in clinical practice have AUDs, which offer a variety of treatment options if diagnosed. The diagnosis of AUDs relies on clinical and alcohol-related history, physical examination, questionnaires and laboratory values. No clinical available laboratory test [e.g. for acute abuse: alcohol in blood or breath; for chronic alcohol abuse: gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), mean corpuscular volume (MCV), carbohydrate-deficient transferrin (CDT)] is reliable enough on its own to support a diagnosis of alcohol dependence, harmful use or abuse. Sensitivities, specificities and the predictive values may vary considerably according to patient and control group characteristics (e.g. gender, age or related comorbidity). In patient groups with limited cooperation markers may be helpful when considering treatment options. CONCLUSIONS: More research is needed to determine the value of markers (single or combined, with questionnaires) in the context of clinical decision-making algorithms in defined settings and with defined dichotomous outcome variables.
BACKGROUND: Biomedical markers may provide additive objective information in screening and confirmation of acute or recent consumption, intoxication, relapse, heavy drinking, hazardous/harmful use/abuse and dependence and alcohol use related organ dysfunction (alcohol use-related disorders: AUDs). AIMS: To review the use of biomarkers in clinical practice to detect AUDs. FINDINGS: About one-fifth of the patients seen in clinical practice have AUDs, which offer a variety of treatment options if diagnosed. The diagnosis of AUDs relies on clinical and alcohol-related history, physical examination, questionnaires and laboratory values. No clinical available laboratory test [e.g. for acute abuse: alcohol in blood or breath; for chronic alcohol abuse: gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), mean corpuscular volume (MCV), carbohydrate-deficient transferrin (CDT)] is reliable enough on its own to support a diagnosis of alcohol dependence, harmful use or abuse. Sensitivities, specificities and the predictive values may vary considerably according to patient and control group characteristics (e.g. gender, age or related comorbidity). In patient groups with limited cooperation markers may be helpful when considering treatment options. CONCLUSIONS: More research is needed to determine the value of markers (single or combined, with questionnaires) in the context of clinical decision-making algorithms in defined settings and with defined dichotomous outcome variables.
Authors: Scott H Stewart; David G Koch; Douglas M Burgess; Ira R Willner; Adrian Reuben Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2012-06-22 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Donald M Dougherty; Nora E Charles; Ashley Acheson; Samantha John; R Michael Furr; Nathalie Hill-Kapturczak Journal: Exp Clin Psychopharmacol Date: 2012-06-18 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Nicolas Bertholet; Michael R Winter; Debbie M Cheng; Jeffrey H Samet; Richard Saitz Journal: Alcohol Alcohol Date: 2014-04-15 Impact factor: 2.826
Authors: Michael Fleming; Bhushan Bhamb; Michael Schurr; Marlon Mundt; Andrea Williams Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2009-07-23 Impact factor: 3.455