Literature DB >> 14984101

A chromosome painting test of the basal eutherian karyotype.

Marta Svartman1, Gary Stone, John E Page, Roscoe Stanyon.   

Abstract

We studied the chromosomes of an Afrotherian species, the short-eared elephant shrew Macroscelides proboscideus with traditional banding techniques and mapped the homology to human chromosomes by in-situ hybridization of human chromosome paints. Here we present for the first time the karyotype of this species, including banding patterns. The chromosome painting allowed us to test various hypotheses of the ancestral Eutherian karyotype, the validity of the radical taxonomic assemblage known as Afrotheria and the phylogenetic position of the elephant shrew within the Afrotheria. Current hypotheses concerning the Eutherian ancestral karyotype include diploid numbers ranging from 2n = 44 to 50 while molecular studies have proposed a new superordinal grouping of extant Eutherians. In particular, the Afrotheria is hotly debated, as it appears to be an odd mixture of species from Ungulata, Tubulidentata, Macroscelidea and Lipotyphla, which have no apparent morphological traits to unite them. The hybridization pattern delimited a total of 37 segments in the elephant shrew genome and revealed 21 different associations of human chromosome segments. Associations 1/19 and 5/21 link all Afrotheria so far studied and support the Afrotheria assemblage. Associations 2/8, 3/20, and 10/17 strongly link aardvarks and elephant shrews after the divergence of the line leading to elephants. The most likely ancestral Eutherian karyotype would be 2n = 48 chromosomes. However, the lack of comparative chromosome painting data between Eutherians and an appropriate outgroup is a severe limitation on attempts to delineate the ancestral genome of Eutherians. Current attempts lack legitimacy until this situation is corrected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14984101     DOI: 10.1023/b:chro.0000009294.18760.e4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosome Res        ISSN: 0967-3849            Impact factor:   5.239


  26 in total

1.  Reciprocal chromosome painting shows that genomic rearrangement between rat and mouse proceeds ten times faster than between humans and cats.

Authors:  R Stanyon; F Yang; P Cavagna; P C O'Brien; M Bagga; M A Ferguson-Smith; J Wienberg
Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet       Date:  1999

2.  The earliest known eutherian mammal.

Authors:  Qiang Ji; Zhe-Xi Luo; Chong-Xi Yuan; John R Wible; Jian-Ping Zhang; Justin A Georgi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-04-25       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Controlled silver-staining of nucleolus organizer regions with a protective colloidal developer: a 1-step method.

Authors:  W M Howell; D A Black
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1980-08-15

4.  Mammalian mitogenomic relationships and the root of the eutherian tree.

Authors:  Ulfur Arnason; Joseph A Adegoke; Kristina Bodin; Erik W Born; Yuzine B Esa; Anette Gullberg; Maria Nilsson; Roger V Short; Xiufeng Xu; Axel Janke
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-05-28       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Molecular evidence for the early divergence of placental mammals.

Authors:  S Easteal
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.345

6.  Resolution of the early placental mammal radiation using Bayesian phylogenetics.

Authors:  W J Murphy; E Eizirik; S J O'Brien; O Madsen; M Scally; C J Douady; E Teeling; O A Ryder; M J Stanhope; W W de Jong; M S Springer
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-12-14       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Molecular dating and biogeography of the early placental mammal radiation.

Authors:  E Eizirik; W J Murphy; S J O'Brien
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.645

8.  The origin of human chromosome 1 and its homologs in placental mammals.

Authors:  William J Murphy; Lutz Frönicke; Stephen J O'Brien; Roscoe Stanyon
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-07-17       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  Cytogenetic analysis by chromosome painting using DOP-PCR amplified flow-sorted chromosomes.

Authors:  H Telenius; A H Pelmear; A Tunnacliffe; N P Carter; A Behmel; M A Ferguson-Smith; M Nordenskjöld; R Pfragner; B A Ponder
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 5.006

10.  Molecular phylogeny of living xenarthrans and the impact of character and taxon sampling on the placental tree rooting.

Authors:  Frédéric Delsuc; Mark Scally; Ole Madsen; Michael J Stanhope; Wilfried W de Jong; François M Catzeflis; Mark S Springer; Emmanuel J P Douzery
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 16.240

View more
  16 in total

1.  Comparative genome maps of the pangolin, hedgehog, sloth, anteater and human revealed by cross-species chromosome painting: further insight into the ancestral karyotype and genome evolution of eutherian mammals.

Authors:  Fengtang Yang; Alexander S Graphodatsky; Tangliang Li; Beiyuan Fu; Gauthier Dobigny; Jinghuan Wang; Polina L Perelman; Natalya A Serdukova; Weiting Su; Patricia Cm O'Brien; Yingxiang Wang; Malcolm A Ferguson-Smith; Vitaly Volobouev; Wenhui Nie
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2006-04-20       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  Are molecular cytogenetics and bioinformatics suggesting diverging models of ancestral mammalian genomes?

Authors:  Lutz Froenicke; Montserrat Garcia Caldés; Alexander Graphodatsky; Stefan Müller; Leslie A Lyons; Terence J Robinson; Marianne Volleth; Fengtang Yang; Johannes Wienberg
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Hemiplasy and homoplasy in the karyotypic phylogenies of mammals.

Authors:  Terence J Robinson; Aurora Ruiz-Herrera; John C Avise
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Molecular cytogenetic and genomic insights into chromosomal evolution.

Authors:  A Ruiz-Herrera; M Farré; T J Robinson
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 3.821

5.  Chromosome painting and molecular dating indicate a low rate of chromosomal evolution in golden moles (Mammalia, Chrysochloridae).

Authors:  C Gilbert; P C O'Brien; G Bronner; F Yang; A Hassanin; M A Ferguson-Smith; T J Robinson
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2007-01-19       Impact factor: 5.239

6.  Cross-species chromosome painting unveils cytogenetic signatures for the Eulipotyphla and evidence for the polyphyly of Insectivora.

Authors:  Jianping Ye; Larisa Biltueva; Ling Huang; Wenhui Nie; Jinhuan Wang; Meidong Jing; Weiting Su; Nadezhda V Vorobieva; Xuelong Jiang; Alexander S Graphodatsky; Fengtang Yang
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2006-03-17       Impact factor: 5.239

7.  Cross-species chromosome painting in the golden mole and elephant-shrew: support for the mammalian clades Afrotheria and Afroinsectiphillia but not Afroinsectivora.

Authors:  T J Robinson; B Fu; M A Ferguson-Smith; F Yang
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Defining the ancestral eutherian karyotype: a cladistic interpretation of chromosome painting and genome sequence assembly data.

Authors:  Terence J Robinson; Aurora Ruiz-Herrera
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 5.239

9.  Chromosome painting in three-toed sloths: a cytogenetic signature and ancestral karyotype for Xenarthra.

Authors:  Nathália F Azevedo; Marta Svartman; Andrea Manchester; Nádia de Moraes-Barros; Roscoe Stanyon; Angela M Vianna-Morgante
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  Gene synteny comparisons between different vertebrates provide new insights into breakage and fusion events during mammalian karyotype evolution.

Authors:  Claus Kemkemer; Matthias Kohn; David N Cooper; Lutz Froenicke; Josef Högel; Horst Hameister; Hildegard Kehrer-Sawatzki
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.