OBJECTIVES: To analyse simple national statistics and survival data collected in the central cardiac audit database after treatment for congenital heart disease and to provide long term comparative statistics for each contributing centre. DESIGN: Prospective, longitudinal, observational, national cohort survival study. SETTING: UK central cardiac audit database. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Survival at 30 days and one year after treatment in the year April 2000-March 2001, assessed by using both volunteered life status and independently validated life status through the Office for National Statistics, using the patient's unique NHS number, or the general register offices of Scotland and Northern Ireland. Institutional results following a group of six benchmark operations and three benchmark catheterisation procedures. RESULTS: Since April 2000 data have been received from all 13 UK tertiary centres performing cardiac surgery or therapeutic cardiac catheterisation in children with congenital heart disease. Altogether 3666 surgical procedures and 1828 therapeutic catheterisations were performed. Central tracking of mortality identified 469 deaths, 194 occurring within 30 days and 275 later. Forty two of the 194 deaths within 30 days were detected by central tracking but not by volunteered data. For surgery overall, survival at 30 days was 94.9%, falling to 91.2% at one year; this effect was most marked for infants. For therapeutic catheterisation survival at 30 days was 99.1%, falling to 98.1% at one year. Survival of individual centres or individual operators did not differ from the national average after benchmark procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Independent data validation is essential for accurate survival analysis. One year survival gives a more realistic view of outcome than traditional perioperative mortality. Currently no detectable difference exists in survival between any of the 13 UK tertiary congenital heart disease centres, but confidence intervals for small centres are wide, limiting our power to detect underperformance from analysis of a single year's data. Appropriately resourced, focused national audit is capable of accurate data collection on which nationwide, long term quality control can be based.
OBJECTIVES: To analyse simple national statistics and survival data collected in the central cardiac audit database after treatment for congenital heart disease and to provide long term comparative statistics for each contributing centre. DESIGN: Prospective, longitudinal, observational, national cohort survival study. SETTING: UK central cardiac audit database. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Survival at 30 days and one year after treatment in the year April 2000-March 2001, assessed by using both volunteered life status and independently validated life status through the Office for National Statistics, using the patient's unique NHS number, or the general register offices of Scotland and Northern Ireland. Institutional results following a group of six benchmark operations and three benchmark catheterisation procedures. RESULTS: Since April 2000 data have been received from all 13 UK tertiary centres performing cardiac surgery or therapeutic cardiac catheterisation in children with congenital heart disease. Altogether 3666 surgical procedures and 1828 therapeutic catheterisations were performed. Central tracking of mortality identified 469 deaths, 194 occurring within 30 days and 275 later. Forty two of the 194 deaths within 30 days were detected by central tracking but not by volunteered data. For surgery overall, survival at 30 days was 94.9%, falling to 91.2% at one year; this effect was most marked for infants. For therapeutic catheterisation survival at 30 days was 99.1%, falling to 98.1% at one year. Survival of individual centres or individual operators did not differ from the national average after benchmark procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Independent data validation is essential for accurate survival analysis. One year survival gives a more realistic view of outcome than traditional perioperative mortality. Currently no detectable difference exists in survival between any of the 13 UK tertiary congenital heart disease centres, but confidence intervals for small centres are wide, limiting our power to detect underperformance from analysis of a single year's data. Appropriately resourced, focused national audit is capable of accurate data collection on which nationwide, long term quality control can be based.
Authors: R C Franklin; R H Anderson; O Daniëls; M Elliott; M H Gewillig; R Ghisla; O N Krogmann; H E Ulmer; F P Stocker Journal: Cardiol Young Date: 2000 Impact factor: 1.093
Authors: P Aylin; B Alves; N Best; A Cook; P Elliott; S J Evans; A E Lawrence; G D Murray; J Pollock; D Spiegelhalter Journal: Lancet Date: 2001-07-21 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Kathy J Jenkins; Kimberlee Gauvreau; Jane W Newburger; Thomas L Spray; James H Moller; Lisa I Iezzoni Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Jeffrey Phillip Jacobs; Constantine Mavroudis; Marshall Lewis Jacobs; Bohdan Maruszewski; Christo I Tchervenkov; Francois G Lacour-Gayet; David Robinson Clarke; J William Gaynor; Thomas L Spray; Hiromi Kurosawa; Giovanni Stellin; Tjark Ebels; Emile A Bacha; Henry L Walters; Martin J Elliott Journal: Pediatr Cardiol Date: 2007-05-04 Impact factor: 1.655
Authors: Jeffrey M Vinocur; Jeremiah S Menk; John Connett; James H Moller; Lazaros K Kochilas Journal: Pediatr Cardiol Date: 2013-02-02 Impact factor: 1.655