Literature DB >> 11476833

Comparison of UK paediatric cardiac surgical performance by analysis of routinely collected data 1984-96: was Bristol an outlier?

P Aylin1, B Alves, N Best, A Cook, P Elliott, S J Evans, A E Lawrence, G D Murray, J Pollock, D Spiegelhalter.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reports of high mortality after paediatric cardiac surgery at the Bristol Royal Infirmary, UK, led to the establishment of an independent public inquiry. A key question was whether or not the mortality statistics in Bristol were unusual compared with other specialist centres. To answer this question, we did a retrospective analysis of mortality in the UK using two datasets.
METHODS: Data from the UK Cardiac Surgical Register (CSR; January, 1984, to March, 1996) and Hospital Episode Statistics (HES; April, 1991, to December, 1995) were obtained for all 12 major centres in which paediatric cardiac surgery is done in the UK. The main outcome measure was mortality within 30 days of a cardiac surgical procedure. We estimated excess deaths in Bristol using a random-effects model derived from the remaining 11 centres. Additionally, a sensitivity analysis was done and case-mix examined.
FINDINGS: For children younger than 1 year, in open operations, the mortality rate in Bristol was around double that of the other centres during 1991-95: within the CSR, there were 19.0 excess deaths (95% interval 2-32) among 43 deaths; and in HES, there were 24.1 excess deaths (12-34) among 41 deaths recorded. There was no strong evidence for excess mortality in Bristol for closed operations or for open operations in children older than 1 year.
INTERPRETATION: Our results suggest that Bristol was an outlier, and we do not believe that statistical variation, systematic bias in data collection, case-mix, or data quality can explain a divergence in performance of this size.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11476833     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05404-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  27 in total

1.  One Bristol, but there could have been many.

Authors:  R Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-07-28

2.  Mortality and volume of cases in paediatric cardiac surgery: retrospective study based on routinely collected data.

Authors:  David J Spiegelhalter
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-02-02

3.  Mortality and volume of cases in paediatric cardiac surgery. Paper confirms poor quality of paediatric heart surgery at Bristol during 1991-5.

Authors:  Stephen Bolsin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-05-04

4.  Mortality control charts for comparing performance of surgical units: validation study using hospital mortality data.

Authors:  Paris P Tekkis; Peter McCulloch; Adrian C Steger; Irving S Benjamin; Jan D Poloniecki
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-04-12

5.  Monitoring mortality rates in general practice after Shipman.

Authors:  Richard Baker; David R Jones; Peter Goldblatt
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-02-01

6.  Congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Tom Treasure
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-03-13

7.  Paediatric cardiac surgical mortality after Bristol: paediatric cardiac hospital episode statistics are unreliable.

Authors:  John L Gibbs; David Cunningham; Marc de Leval; James Monro; Bruce Keogh
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-01-01

8.  Surgery for congenital heart conditions in Oxford.

Authors:  Bruce Keogh
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-02-12

9.  Was Rodney Ledward a statistical outlier? Retrospective analysis using routine hospital data to identify gynaecologists' performance.

Authors:  Mike Harley; Mohammed A Mohammed; Shakir Hussain; John Yates; Abdullah Almasri
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-04-15

10.  Comparison of administrative data with the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI) colorectal cancer database.

Authors:  Mohammed Garout; Henry S Tilney; Paris P Tekkis; Paul Aylin
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-10-25       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.