INTRODUCTION: Portable pressure ventilators, or bi-level ventilators, do not typically have an oxygen control, and thus supplemental oxygen is usually administered by adding it into the mask or the circuit. We conducted this study to test the hypothesis that delivered oxygen concentration using this configuration is affected by the choice of leak port, oxygen injection site, and ventilator settings. METHODS: A lung model simulating spontaneous breathing was connected to the head of a manikin. An oronasal mask was attached to the manikin. A single-limb circuit was attached to the mask and a bi-level ventilator. Three leak ports were compared: leak in the mask, plateau exhalation valve with mask leak port occluded, and leak port in the circuit with mask leak port occluded. Bi-level positive airway pressure (BiPAP) settings of 10/5, 15/5, 20/5, 15/10, 20/10, and 25/10 cm H(2)O were used at respiratory rates of 15 and 25 breaths/min. Oxygen was added into the mask or into the circuit at the ventilator outlet, using flows of 5 and 10 L/min. Carbon dioxide was added into the lung model to produce an end-tidal P(CO(2)) of either 40 or 75 mm Hg. RESULTS: Delivered oxygen concentration was not affected by respiratory rate (p = 0.22) or end-tidal P(CO(2)) (p = 0.74). The oxygen concentration was greater when oxygen was added into the circuit with the leak port in the mask (p < 0.001), whereas oxygen concentration was greater when oxygen was added into the mask with the leak port in circuit (p = 0.005). Oxygen concentration was significantly lower with the leak port in the mask (p < 0.001), with a higher inspiratory positive airway pressure (p < 0.001), and with a higher expiratory positive airway pressure (p < 0.001). The highest oxygen concentration was achieved with oxygen added to the mask, with the leak port in the circuit, and with the lowest settings of inspiratory (10 cm H(2)O) and expiratory (5 cm H(2)O) positive airway pressure. CONCLUSIONS: Delivered oxygen concentration during BiPAP is a complex interaction between the leak port type, the site of oxygen injection, the ventilator settings, and the oxygen flow. Because of this, it is important to continuously measure arterial oxygen saturation via pulse oximetry with patients in acute respiratory failure who are receiving noninvasive ventilation from a bi-level ventilator.
INTRODUCTION: Portable pressure ventilators, or bi-level ventilators, do not typically have an oxygen control, and thus supplemental oxygen is usually administered by adding it into the mask or the circuit. We conducted this study to test the hypothesis that delivered oxygen concentration using this configuration is affected by the choice of leak port, oxygen injection site, and ventilator settings. METHODS: A lung model simulating spontaneous breathing was connected to the head of a manikin. An oronasal mask was attached to the manikin. A single-limb circuit was attached to the mask and a bi-level ventilator. Three leak ports were compared: leak in the mask, plateau exhalation valve with mask leak port occluded, and leak port in the circuit with mask leak port occluded. Bi-level positive airway pressure (BiPAP) settings of 10/5, 15/5, 20/5, 15/10, 20/10, and 25/10 cm H(2)O were used at respiratory rates of 15 and 25 breaths/min. Oxygen was added into the mask or into the circuit at the ventilator outlet, using flows of 5 and 10 L/min. Carbon dioxide was added into the lung model to produce an end-tidal P(CO(2)) of either 40 or 75 mm Hg. RESULTS: Delivered oxygen concentration was not affected by respiratory rate (p = 0.22) or end-tidal P(CO(2)) (p = 0.74). The oxygen concentration was greater when oxygen was added into the circuit with the leak port in the mask (p < 0.001), whereas oxygen concentration was greater when oxygen was added into the mask with the leak port in circuit (p = 0.005). Oxygen concentration was significantly lower with the leak port in the mask (p < 0.001), with a higher inspiratory positive airway pressure (p < 0.001), and with a higher expiratory positive airway pressure (p < 0.001). The highest oxygen concentration was achieved with oxygen added to the mask, with the leak port in the circuit, and with the lowest settings of inspiratory (10 cm H(2)O) and expiratory (5 cm H(2)O) positive airway pressure. CONCLUSIONS: Delivered oxygen concentration during BiPAP is a complex interaction between the leak port type, the site of oxygen injection, the ventilator settings, and the oxygen flow. Because of this, it is important to continuously measure arterial oxygen saturation via pulse oximetry with patients in acute respiratory failure who are receiving noninvasive ventilation from a bi-level ventilator.
Authors: Ayodeji Adegunsoye; Julie M Neborak; Daisy Zhu; Benjamin Cantrill; Nicole Garcia; Justin M Oldham; Imre Noth; Rekha Vij; Tomasz J Kuzniar; Shashi K Bellam; Mary E Strek; Babak Mokhlesi Journal: Chest Date: 2020-05-22 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Richard B Berry; Alejandro Chediak; Lee K Brown; Jonathan Finder; David Gozal; Conrad Iber; Clete A Kushida; Timothy Morgenthaler; James A Rowley; Sally L Davidson-Ward Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2010-10-15 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Aniket S Rali; Christopher Howard; Rachel Miller; Christopher K Morgan; Dennis Mejia; John Sabo; James P Herlihy; Sunjay R Devarajan Journal: Can J Respir Ther Date: 2020-07-23
Authors: Clete A Kushida; Alejandro Chediak; Richard B Berry; Lee K Brown; David Gozal; Conrad Iber; Sairam Parthasarathy; Stuart F Quan; James A Rowley Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2008-04-15 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Philippe Goutorbe; Erwan Daranda; Yves Asencio; Pierre Esnault; Bertrand Prunet; Julien Bordes; Bruno Palmier; Eric Meaudre Journal: BMC Res Notes Date: 2013-07-21
Authors: Domenico Luca Grieco; Salvatore Maurizio Maggiore; Oriol Roca; Elena Spinelli; Bhakti K Patel; Arnaud W Thille; Carmen Sílvia V Barbas; Marina Garcia de Acilu; Salvatore Lucio Cutuli; Filippo Bongiovanni; Marcelo Amato; Jean-Pierre Frat; Tommaso Mauri; John P Kress; Jordi Mancebo; Massimo Antonelli Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2021-07-07 Impact factor: 17.440