Literature DB >> 14981677

Non-linear survival analysis using neural networks.

Ruth M Ripley1, Adrian L Harris, Lionel Tarassenko.   

Abstract

We describe models for survival analysis which are based on a multi-layer perceptron, a type of neural network. These relax the assumptions of the traditional regression models, while including them as particular cases. They allow non-linear predictors to be fitted implicitly and the effect of the covariates to vary over time. The flexibility is included in the model only when it is beneficial, as judged by cross-validation. Such models can be used to guide a search for extra regressors, by comparing their predictive accuracy with that of linear models. Most also allow the estimation of the hazard function, of which a great variety can be modelled. In this paper we describe seven different neural network survival models and illustrate their use by comparing their performance in predicting the time to relapse for breast cancer patients. Copyright 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14981677     DOI: 10.1002/sim.1655

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  20 in total

1.  Pathway analysis using random forests with bivariate node-split for survival outcomes.

Authors:  Herbert Pang; Debayan Datta; Hongyu Zhao
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Support Vector Hazards Machine: A Counting Process Framework for Learning Risk Scores for Censored Outcomes.

Authors:  Yuanjia Wang; Tianle Chen; Donglin Zeng
Journal:  J Mach Learn Res       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 3.654

3.  Predicting survival time for metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer: An iterative imputation approach.

Authors:  Detian Deng; Yu Du; Zhicheng Ji; Karthik Rao; Zhenke Wu; Yuxin Zhu; R Yates Coley
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2016-11-16

4.  Gene selection using iterative feature elimination random forests for survival outcomes.

Authors:  Herbert Pang; Stephen L George; Ken Hui; Tiejun Tong
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.710

5.  Assessing the effect of quantitative and qualitative predictors on gastric cancer individuals survival using hierarchical artificial neural network models.

Authors:  Zohreh Amiri; Kazem Mohammad; Mahmood Mahmoudi; Mahbubeh Parsaeian; Hojjat Zeraati
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 0.611

6.  Nonlinear association between serum testosterone levels and coronary artery disease in Iranian men.

Authors:  Nader Fallah; Kazem Mohammad; Keramat Nourijelyani; Mohammad Reza Eshraghian; Seyyed Ali Seyyedsalehi; Maria Raiessi; Maziar Rahmani; Hamid Reza Goodarzi; Soodabeh Darvish; Hojjat Zeraati; Gholamreza Davoodi; Saeed Sadeghian
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 8.082

7.  For an always promising transplant prediction, call ANN.

Authors:  David W Gjertson; Bill D Clark
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 4.939

8.  Testing pollen of single and stacked insect-resistant Bt-maize on in vitro reared honey bee larvae.

Authors:  Harmen P Hendriksma; Stephan Härtel; Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  New concepts in breast cancer emerge from analyzing clinical data using numerical algorithms.

Authors:  Michael Retsky
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Applications of machine learning in cancer prediction and prognosis.

Authors:  Joseph A Cruz; David S Wishart
Journal:  Cancer Inform       Date:  2007-02-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.