BACKGROUND: Several studies indicate semantic fluency more sensitively discriminates patients with Alzheimer disease (AD) from normal elderly persons, with disproportionate impairment of semantic over phonemic fluency. OBJECTIVE: To determine the ability of abbreviated fluency measures in the clinic setting (1-minute letter F and animal fluency tests) to detect AD, and to assess whether difference scores between these measures discriminate patients with AD and vascular dementia (VaD) from normal elderly persons. METHODS: The authors studied patients with AD (n = 98) meeting National Institute of Neurological Communicative Disorders and Stroke-Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association criteria, VaD patients (n = 18) meeting National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke-Association Internationale pour la Recherche et l'Enseignement en Neurosciences criteria, cognitively impaired but not demented patients (CIND; n = 25), vascular CIND patients (VCIND; n = 24), and normal control subjects (NCs; n = 46). RESULTS: Analysis of covariance controlling for age, education, and overall impairment indicated all groups generated fewer animal names compared with NCs, whereas only VaD patients generated fewer letter F words compared with NCs. On standardized scores, patients with AD and CIND, unlike those with VCIND and VaD, scored significantly worse on the animal fluency test than on the letter F fluency test. The animal fluency test was superior in discriminating all patient groups from NCs. Positive likelihood ratios (PLRs) revealed animal fluency scores <15 were 20 times more likely in a patient with AD than in an NC (sensitivity = 0.88; specificity = 0.96). Letter F scores <4 discriminated VaD from AD patients (PLR = 4.0; sensitivity = 0.44; specificity = 0.90). Difference scores <0 (i.e., fewer animal than letter F words) discriminated patients with VCIND from those with CIND (PLR = 2.5; sensitivity = 0.32; specificity = 1.00). CONCLUSIONS: A 1-minute semantic fluency test can assist in early detection of dementia in the memory clinic setting.
BACKGROUND: Several studies indicate semantic fluency more sensitively discriminates patients with Alzheimer disease (AD) from normal elderly persons, with disproportionate impairment of semantic over phonemic fluency. OBJECTIVE: To determine the ability of abbreviated fluency measures in the clinic setting (1-minute letter F and animal fluency tests) to detect AD, and to assess whether difference scores between these measures discriminate patients with AD and vascular dementia (VaD) from normal elderly persons. METHODS: The authors studied patients with AD (n = 98) meeting National Institute of Neurological Communicative Disorders and Stroke-Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association criteria, VaD patients (n = 18) meeting National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke-Association Internationale pour la Recherche et l'Enseignement en Neurosciences criteria, cognitively impaired but not demented patients (CIND; n = 25), vascular CINDpatients (VCIND; n = 24), and normal control subjects (NCs; n = 46). RESULTS: Analysis of covariance controlling for age, education, and overall impairment indicated all groups generated fewer animal names compared with NCs, whereas only VaD patients generated fewer letter F words compared with NCs. On standardized scores, patients with AD and CIND, unlike those with VCIND and VaD, scored significantly worse on the animal fluency test than on the letter F fluency test. The animal fluency test was superior in discriminating all patient groups from NCs. Positive likelihood ratios (PLRs) revealed animal fluency scores <15 were 20 times more likely in a patient with AD than in an NC (sensitivity = 0.88; specificity = 0.96). Letter F scores <4 discriminated VaD from ADpatients (PLR = 4.0; sensitivity = 0.44; specificity = 0.90). Difference scores <0 (i.e., fewer animal than letter F words) discriminated patients with VCIND from those with CIND (PLR = 2.5; sensitivity = 0.32; specificity = 1.00). CONCLUSIONS: A 1-minute semantic fluency test can assist in early detection of dementia in the memory clinic setting.
Authors: J M Ringman; C Diaz-Olavarrieta; Y Rodriguez; M Chavez; L Fairbanks; F Paz; A Varpetian; H C Maldonado; M A Macias-Islas; J Murrell; B Ghetti; C Kawas Journal: Neurology Date: 2005-08-23 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Elizabeth M Hudak; Jennifer Bugos; Ross Andel; Jennifer J Lister; Ming Ji; Jerri D Edwards Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2019-06-18 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Ismay N van Loon; Namiko A Goto; Franciscus T J Boereboom; Michiel L Bots; Marianne C Verhaar; Marije E Hamaker Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2017-07-17 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: James A Blumenthal; Patrick J Smith; Stephanie Mabe; Alan Hinderliter; Kathleen Welsh-Bohmer; Jeffrey N Browndyke; Pao-Hwa Lin; William Kraus; P Murali Doraiswamy; James Burke; Andrew Sherwood Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2017 Jul/Aug Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: Ellen Grober; Charles B Hall; Richard B Lipton; Alan B Zonderman; Susan M Resnick; Claudia Kawas Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 2.892