BACKGROUND: Cryotherapy is commonly applied without research documenting the intra-articular (IA) temperature changes or subject discomfort between ice and a cryotherapy device. HYPOTHESIS: The null hypothesis is that no difference would be observed in IA temperature decline or subject tolerance between ice and the cryotherapy device in normal knees. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, within-subject controlled clinical trial. METHODS: Twelve subjects had IA temperature in suprapatellar pouch and skin recorded bilaterally after application of cryotherapy versus ice. Subject tolerance was recorded by 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS). Statistical evaluation was by Spearman's correlation analysis and paired, nonparametric Wilcoxon's signed rank test. RESULTS: Both significantly lowered (P < 0.001) skin and IA temperature with median decreases (ice/cryotherapy) at 30 (3.3 degrees C/2.2 degrees C), 60 (12.8 degrees C/7.1 degrees C), and 90 (15.2 degrees C/9.7 degrees C) minutes. However, ice lowered the IA temperature significantly more than the cryotherapy device (P < 0.001) and was more painful by VAS at 30 and 60 minutes (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Both methods produced large declines in skin and IA temperatures. However, ice was more effective yet resulted in higher pain scores. The authors hypothesize that IA temperatures below a threshold are associated with increased perceived pain.
BACKGROUND: Cryotherapy is commonly applied without research documenting the intra-articular (IA) temperature changes or subject discomfort between ice and a cryotherapy device. HYPOTHESIS: The null hypothesis is that no difference would be observed in IA temperature decline or subject tolerance between ice and the cryotherapy device in normal knees. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, within-subject controlled clinical trial. METHODS: Twelve subjects had IA temperature in suprapatellar pouch and skin recorded bilaterally after application of cryotherapy versus ice. Subject tolerance was recorded by 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS). Statistical evaluation was by Spearman's correlation analysis and paired, nonparametric Wilcoxon's signed rank test. RESULTS: Both significantly lowered (P < 0.001) skin and IA temperature with median decreases (ice/cryotherapy) at 30 (3.3 degrees C/2.2 degrees C), 60 (12.8 degrees C/7.1 degrees C), and 90 (15.2 degrees C/9.7 degrees C) minutes. However, ice lowered the IA temperature significantly more than the cryotherapy device (P < 0.001) and was more painful by VAS at 30 and 60 minutes (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Both methods produced large declines in skin and IA temperatures. However, ice was more effective yet resulted in higher pain scores. The authors hypothesize that IA temperatures below a threshold are associated with increased perceived pain.
Authors: Natalia Mejia; Karl Dedow; Lindsey Nguy; Patrick Sullivan; Sepideh Khoshnevis; Kenneth R Diller Journal: J Med Device Date: 2015-08-06 Impact factor: 0.582
Authors: Riann M Palmieri; J Craig Garrison; Jamie L Leonard; Jeffrey E Edwards; Arthur Weltman; Christopher D Ingersoll Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2006 Apr-Jun Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Mario Hevesi; Janet M Denbeigh; Carlo A Paggi; Catalina Galeano-Garces; Leila Bagheri; A Noelle Larson; Michael J Stuart; Daniel B F Saris; Andre J van Wijnen; Aaron J Krych Journal: Cartilage Date: 2019-10-16 Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: Christoph Becher; Jan Springer; Sven Feil; Guiliano Cerulli; Hans H Paessler Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2008-04-11 Impact factor: 2.362