BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic examination has shown that the regenerative cartilage that appears after arthroscopic drilling for the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talar dome does not always cover the cartilage defect sufficiently. HYPOTHESIS: The remaining degenerative cartilage at the lesions may obstruct the healing of the articular cartilage. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. METHODS:Thirty-nine patients underwentarthroscopic drilling that kept the remaining cartilage at the lesion (group A), and 30 patients underwent arthroscopic drilling that removed the remaining cartilage at the lesion (group B). At 1 year after the operation, we performed ankle arthroscopy to evaluate the cartilage condition. RESULTS: The arthroscopic findings revealed that in group A, 11 cases (28.2%) were improved, 12 cases (30.8%) were unchanged, and 16 cases (41.0%) had deteriorated; in group B, 27 cases (93.1%) were improved and 2 cases were unchanged. There were significant differences between group A and group B in the rate of cases whose cartilage condition was seen to improve under arthroscopic examination (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The study shows that in the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talar dome, the removing of the remaining degenerative cartilage may be of some benefit in the treatment of these lesions.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic examination has shown that the regenerative cartilage that appears after arthroscopic drilling for the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talar dome does not always cover the cartilage defect sufficiently. HYPOTHESIS: The remaining degenerative cartilage at the lesions may obstruct the healing of the articular cartilage. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. METHODS: Thirty-nine patients underwent arthroscopic drilling that kept the remaining cartilage at the lesion (group A), and 30 patients underwent arthroscopic drilling that removed the remaining cartilage at the lesion (group B). At 1 year after the operation, we performed ankle arthroscopy to evaluate the cartilage condition. RESULTS: The arthroscopic findings revealed that in group A, 11 cases (28.2%) were improved, 12 cases (30.8%) were unchanged, and 16 cases (41.0%) had deteriorated; in group B, 27 cases (93.1%) were improved and 2 cases were unchanged. There were significant differences between group A and group B in the rate of cases whose cartilage condition was seen to improve under arthroscopic examination (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The study shows that in the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talar dome, the removing of the remaining degenerative cartilage may be of some benefit in the treatment of these lesions.
Authors: Maartje Zengerink; Peter A A Struijs; Johannes L Tol; Cornelis Niek van Dijk Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2009-10-27 Impact factor: 4.342