Literature DB >> 14974820

Vertical distance from the crest of bone to the height of the interproximal papilla between adjacent implants.

Dennis Tarnow1, Nicolas Elian, Paul Fletcher, Stuart Froum, Ann Magner, Sang-Choon Cho, Maurice Salama, Henry Salama, David A Garber.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As patient demand increases for more natural restorations in the esthetic zone, clinicians must have the highest level of skill and knowledge to maintain or reform the interdental papilla between teeth, between implants and teeth, and between adjacent implants. To date, there are no reports that have measured the distance from the contact point to the bony crest between implants. One reason for this may be the fact that, with two adjacent implants, the contact point of the crown can be established at any distance from the gingival margin according to the restorative dentist's specifications. Therefore, in this study, the height of the soft tissue to the crest of bone was measured between two adjacent implants independent of the location of the contact point. The purpose of this study was to determine the range and average height of tissue between two adjacent implants.
METHODS: A total of 136 interimplant papillary heights were examined in 33 patients by eight different examiners in five private dental offices. After administration of appropriate local anesthesia, a standardized periodontal probe was placed vertically from the height of the papilla to the crest of bone. The measurements were rounded off to the nearest millimeter.
RESULTS: The mean height of papillary tissue between two adjacent implants was 3.4 mm, with a range of 1 mm to 7 mm.
CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should proceed with great caution when placing two implants adjacent to each other in the esthetic zone. In most cases, only 2, 3, or 4 mm of soft tissue height (average 3.4 mm) can be expected to form over the interimplant crest of bone. These results showed that modification of treatment plans may be necessary when esthetics are critical for success.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14974820     DOI: 10.1902/jop.2003.74.12.1785

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Periodontol        ISSN: 0022-3492            Impact factor:   6.993


  26 in total

1.  Calibration of radiographs by a reference metal ball affects preoperative selection of implant size.

Authors:  Lars Schropp; Andreas Stavropoulos; Erik Gotfredsen; Ann Wenzel
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Distance between implants has a potential impact of crestal bone resorption.

Authors:  Matteo Danza; Ilaria Zollino; Anna Avantaggiato; Alessandra Lucchese; Francesco Carinci
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2011-02-19

3.  New technique for inter-implant papilla reconstruction between two or more implants in patients with variably reabsorbed ridges and flat anatomy. Preliminary results of a 9 consecutive clinical case series.

Authors:  R Tizzoni; M Tizzoni
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2010-11-19

4.  Are implants more reliable than severely compromised endodontically treated teeth as abutments for zirconia-based FPDs? : In vitro results of long-term preclinical load simulation.

Authors:  M Naumann; C Hohmann; A Happe; F Beuer; R Frankenberger; R Seemann; M Rosentritt
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-10-27       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Clinical assessment of submerged vs non-submerged implants placed in pristine bone.

Authors:  P Cardelli; F Cecchetti; M Montani; E Bramanti; C Arcuri
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2014-05-19

Review 6.  Factors affecting the complexity of dental implant restoration - what is the current evidence and guidance?

Authors:  S P Wright; J Hayden; J A Lynd; K Walker-Finch; J Willett; C Ucer; S D Speechley
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 1.626

7.  The effect of peri-implant bone exposure on soft tissue healing and bone loss in two adjacent implants.

Authors:  Seung-Yun Shin; Seung-Boem Kye; Jongrak Hong; Jun-Young Paeng; Seung-Min Yang
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 2.614

8.  The level of buccal gingival margin around single and two adjacent implant restorations: a preliminary result.

Authors:  Young-Bum Kim; June-Sung Shim; Chong-Hyun Han; Sun-Jai Kim
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2009-11-30       Impact factor: 1.904

9.  A 3-year prospective cohort study on mandibular anterior cantilever restorations associated with screw-retained implant-supported prosthesis: An in vivo study.

Authors:  Vizaikumar Vasudha Nelluri; Kandathilparambil Maria Roseme; Rajani Kumar Gedela
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2021 Apr-Jun

10.  Current results and trends in platform switching.

Authors:  Hadi Salimi; Omid Savabi; Farahnaz Nejatidanesh
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2011-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.