Literature DB >> 14971582

Medical malpractice predictors and risk factors for ophthalmologists performing LASIK and PRK surgery.

Richard L Abbott1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To identify physician predictors in laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) surgery that correlate with a higher risk for malpractice liability claims and lawsuits.
METHODOLOGY: A retrospective, longitudinal, cohort study comparing physician characteristics of 100 consecutive Ophthalmic Mutual Insurance Company (OMIC) LASIK and PRK claims and suits to demographic and practice pattern data for all active refractive surgeons insured by OMIC between 1996 and 2002. Background information and data were obtained from OMIC underwriting applications, a physician practice pattern survey, and claims file records. Using an outcome of whether or not a physician had a prior history of a claim or suit, logistic regression analyses were used separately for each predictor as well as controlling for refractive surgery volume.
RESULTS: Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the most important predictor of filing a claim was surgical volume, with those performing more surgery having a greater risk of incurring a claim (odds ratio [OR], 31.4 for >1,000/year versus 0 to 20/year; 95% confidence interval [CI], 7.9 - 125; P = .0001). Having one or more prior claims was the only other predictor examined that remained statistically significant after controlling for patient volume (OR, 6.4; 95% CI 2.5 - 16.4; P = .0001). Physician gender, advertising, preoperative time spent with patient, and comanagement appeared to be strong predictors in multivariate analyses when surgical volume was greater than 100 cases per year.
CONCLUSION: The chances of incurring a malpractice claim or suit for PRK or LASIK correlates significantly with higher surgical volume and a history of a prior claim or suit. Additional risk factors that increase in importance with higher surgical volume include gender, advertising, preoperative time spent with patient, and comanagement with optometrists. These findings may be used in the future to help improve the quality of care for patients undergoing refractive surgery and provide data for underwriting criteria and risk management protocols to proactively manage and reduce the risk of claims and lawsuits against refractive surgeons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14971582      PMCID: PMC1358993     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc        ISSN: 0065-9533


  16 in total

1.  Surgical outcomes of photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis by inexperienced surgeons.

Authors:  C Yo; C Vroman; S Ma; L Chao; P J McDonnell
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.351

2.  Professional liability insurance. I. A historical perspective.

Authors:  Janet Spicer
Journal:  N J Med       Date:  2002-04

3.  The informed consent doctrine. A defined responsibility.

Authors:  Theresa Arnold
Journal:  N J Med       Date:  2002-04

4.  Medical malpractice and quality: an interconnected problem.

Authors:  James T Ziegenfuss
Journal:  Am J Med Qual       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.852

Review 5.  Strategic risk management: reducing malpractice claims through more effective patient-doctor communication.

Authors:  B B Virshup; A A Oppenberg; M M Coleman
Journal:  Am J Med Qual       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.852

6.  Medical malpractice experience of physicians. Predictable or haphazard?

Authors:  F A Sloan; P M Mergenhagen; W B Burfield; R R Bovbjerg; M Hassan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1989-12-15       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  The origin, basis and nature of medical malpractice liability.

Authors:  V M Gordon
Journal:  Conn Med       Date:  1971-02

Review 8.  Informed consent and medical ethics.

Authors:  D Finkelstein; M K Smith; R Faden
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1993-03

Review 9.  Informed consent.

Authors:  J A Gold
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1993-03

10.  Patient complaints and malpractice risk.

Authors:  Gerald B Hickson; Charles F Federspiel; James W Pichert; Cynthia S Miller; Jean Gauld-Jaeger; Preston Bost
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-06-12       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  3 in total

1.  Surgeon demographics and medical malpractice in adult reconstruction.

Authors:  Brian J McGrory; B Sonny Bal; Sally York; William Macaulay; David B McConnell
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Medical malpractice claims related to cataract surgery complicated by retained lens fragments (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis).

Authors:  Judy E Kim; Paul Weber; Aniko Szabo
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2012-12

Review 3.  The parameters of informed consent.

Authors:  Edward L Raab
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2004
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.