Literature DB >> 14970979

Effects of electric stimulation on C and A delta fiber-mediated thermal perception thresholds.

Shea T Palmer1, Denis J Martin, Wilma M Steedman, John Ravey.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if interferential current (IFC) or transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS) alters C and A delta fiber-mediated thermal perception thresholds.
DESIGN: Single-blind, randomized controlled trial.
SETTING: Laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred forty healthy women volunteers (mean age +/- standard deviation, 20.6+/-2.7 y).
INTERVENTIONS: Subjects were randomly and exclusively assigned to 1 of 7 groups (n=20 in each): 0, 5, and 100 Hz of IFC; 5 and 100 Hz of TENS; placebo and control stimulation. Stimulation was applied through 2 electrodes placed over the median nerve. Warm sensation, cold sensation, hot pain, and cold pain perception thresholds were measured from the thenar eminence by using a quantitative sensory testing device and a method of limits algorithm. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Warm sensation, cold sensation, hot pain, and cold pain thresholds (degrees C) before, during, and after stimulation.
RESULTS: There was a statistically significant effect of time for all 4 thermal perception thresholds (separate 2-way analyses of variance with repeated measures, all P<.001). There were no statistically significant differences between experimental groups, nor any interaction effects (all P>.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Neither IFC nor TENS altered C and A delta fiber-mediated thermal perception thresholds. The results suggest that any analgesic mechanisms with these modalities are likely to be complex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14970979     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9993(03)00432-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  6 in total

1.  Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and conditioned pain modulation influence the perception of pain in humans.

Authors:  R E Liebano; C G Vance; B A Rakel; J E Lee; N A Cooper; S Marchand; D M Walsh; K A Sluka
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 3.931

2.  Supraspinal neural mechanisms of the analgesic effect produced by transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation.

Authors:  Yanzhi Bi; Zhaoxing Wei; Yazhuo Kong; Li Hu
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 3.270

3.  A new transient sham TENS device allows for investigator blinding while delivering a true placebo treatment.

Authors:  Barbara Rakel; Nicholas Cooper; Heather J Adams; Bryan R Messer; Laura A Frey Law; Douglas R Dannen; Carrie A Miller; Anya C Polehna; Rachelle C Ruggle; Carol G T Vance; Deirdre M Walsh; Kathleen A Sluka
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 5.820

4.  Efficacy of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation on Salivary Flow Rates in Normal Healthy Adults According to Gender and Age Groups.

Authors:  C Ramesh; Sharad S Sawant; Deepak R Kolte; Barun Kumar; Kosuru Kranthi; Tejal R Patil; J Suresh Babu; C Swarnalatha; Abhishek Singh Nayyar
Journal:  Asian J Neurosurg       Date:  2021-09-07

5.  Role of C-fibers in pain and morphine induced analgesia/hyperalgesia in rats.

Authors:  Zahra Alizadeh; Masoud Fereidoni; Morteza Behnam-Rassouli; Shirin Hosseini
Journal:  Iran J Neurol       Date:  2014

6.  High- and low-frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation does not reduce experimental pain in elderly individuals.

Authors:  Kayla Bergeron-Vézina; Hélène Corriveau; Marylie Martel; Marie-Philippe Harvey; Guillaume Léonard
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 7.926

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.