Literature DB >> 14969796

Impact of prior biopsy scheme on pathologic features of cancers detected on repeat biopsies.

Y Mark Hong1, Frank C Lai, Chris H Chon, John E McNeal, Joseph C Presti.   

Abstract

The object of our study was to characterize the biopsy features of cancers detected in a repeat biopsy population stratified on the basis of the type of prior negative biopsy. We studied 218 patients with a prior negative biopsy who underwent a 10-core extended systematic biopsy scheme, and a subset (n = 139) underwent additional 6 anteriorly directed biopsies. Clinicopathologic features of patients with cancer on the biopsy were compared as a function of type of prior negative biopsy. Overall and unique cancer detection rates were calculated for each of the biopsy sites. Cancer detection rates tended to be higher in patients who had undergone a prior sextant biopsy compared to a prior extended biopsy scheme (39% vs. 28%). Trends towards more positive cores and greater total core length of cancer involvement were seen in patients who had undergone a prior negative sextant biopsy. Apical and laterally directed biopsies had higher overall and unique cancer detection rates in patients who had undergone a prior negative sextant biopsy. Anteriorly directed biopsies had a low unique cancer detection rate in all patients. We conclude that in patients undergoing repeat biopsy, the detection rate is affected by the extent of the prior biopsy. Clinicopathologic features of cancers detected on repeat biopsy tend to be worse in patients who have undergone a prior negative sextant biopsy compared to a negative prior extended biopsy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14969796     DOI: 10.1016/S1078-1439(03)00147-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Oncol        ISSN: 1078-1439            Impact factor:   3.498


  12 in total

1.  CUA guidelines on prostate biopsy methodology.

Authors:  Assaad El-Hakim; Sabri Moussa
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Prostate biopsy: current status and limitations.

Authors:  Joseph C Presti
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2007

Review 3.  Strategies for repeat prostate biopsies.

Authors:  Martha K Terris
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Using biopsy to detect prostate cancer.

Authors:  Shahrokh F Shariat; Claus G Roehrborn
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2008

Review 5.  Standards for prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Marc A Bjurlin; Samir S Taneja
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.309

Review 6.  Management of rising prostate-specific antigen after a negative biopsy.

Authors:  David A Levy; J Stephen Jones
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.092

7.  The effect of prior biopsy scheme on prostate cancer detection for repeat biopsy population: results of the 14-core prostate biopsy technique.

Authors:  Saadettin Yilmaz Eskicorapci; Fuad Guliyev; Ekrem Islamoglu; Ali Ergen; Haluk Ozen
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2006-06-01       Impact factor: 2.370

8.  The role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in prostate cancer imaging and staging at 1.5 and 3 Tesla: the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC) approach.

Authors:  B Nicolas Bloch; Robert E Lenkinski; Neil M Rofsky
Journal:  Cancer Biomark       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.388

Review 9.  Rationale and protocol for randomized study of transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsy efficacy and complications (ProBE-PC study).

Authors:  Badar M Mian; Ronald P Kaufman; Hugh A G Fisher
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 5.554

10.  Significance of atypical small acinar proliferation and high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia in prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Orhan Koca; Selahattin Calışkan; Metin İshak Oztürk; Mustafa Güneş; M Ihsan Karaman
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2011-11-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.