Literature DB >> 14969615

Incidence of thrombus formation on the CardioSEAL and the Amplatzer interatrial closure devices.

Hitoshi Anzai1, John Child, Barbara Natterson, Janine Krivokapich, Michael C Fishbein, Vicki K Chan, Jonathan M Tobis.   

Abstract

Transcatheter closure for atrial septal defect (ASD) and patent foramen ovale (PFO) is a promising alternative to surgical closure or anticoagulant therapy. A potential complication is thrombus formation on the device after implantation. From February 2001 to June 2003, 66 patients with atrial communication were treated successfully with the Amplatzer device (16 septal and 20 PFO occluders) or the CardioSEAL device (30). Patients were discharged on antiplatelet medication (aspirin and clopidogrel) and/or anticoagulation. Fifty patients (76%) had transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) 1 month after device implantation (28 +/- 10 days). No patient experienced a thromboembolic episode during follow-up. TEE revealed that thrombus formation occurred more frequently on the CardioSEAL device (5 of 23 patients; 22%) than on the Amplatzer device (0 of 27 patients; 0%) (p = 0.02). Although thrombus disappeared or markedly diminished after additional anticoagulation therapy in 3 patients, 1 patient had surgical explantation of the device due to progressive increase in the size of thrombus with hypermobility despite intensive anticoagulation therapy. There was no variable associated with the presence of thrombus formation on the occluder other than the use of the CardioSEAL device. One month after insertion, the CardioSEAL device is more likely to have thrombus present than the Amplatzer device.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14969615     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2003.10.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  19 in total

Review 1.  Atrial septum defect closure device in a beating heart, from the perspective of a researcher in artificial organs.

Authors:  Yasuko Tomizawa
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 1.731

Review 2.  Closure of patent foramen ovale: technique, pitfalls, complications, and follow up.

Authors:  B Meier
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 3.  Cryptogenic stroke in patients with patent foramen ovale.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Saver
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.113

4.  The role of the sizing balloon in selection of the patent foramen ovale closure device size.

Authors:  J Alibegovic; Rf Bonvini; U Sigwart; Pa Dorsaz; E Camenzind; V Verin
Journal:  Exp Clin Cardiol       Date:  2008

5.  Percutaneous closure of secundum type atrial septal defects: More than 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Roel Jr Snijder; Maarten J Suttorp; Jurriën M Ten Berg; Martijn C Post
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2015-03-26

Review 6.  Current status of percutaneous PFO closure.

Authors:  N Rohrhoff; J P Vavalle; S Halim; T L Kiefer; J K Harrison
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.931

7.  PFO and ASD Closure in Adulthood: Where Do We Stand?

Authors:  Asad A Rizvi; Ronan Margey
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2014-04

8.  De novo thrombus on an atrial septal defect device 3 years after its implantation.

Authors:  Olawale O Olabiyi; David L S Morales; Wayne J Franklin
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 1.655

Review 9.  Transcatheter closure of secundum atrial septal defect.

Authors:  Hideto Shimpo; Reina Hojo; Maeshiro Ryo; Takeshi Konuma; Hironori Tempaku
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-06-18

10.  Paradoxical embolization in an adult cystic fibrosis patient.

Authors:  Nabil M Al Lawati; Pearce Wilcox
Journal:  Can Respir J       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.409

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.