Literature DB >> 14969487

Estimation of false discovery rates in multiple testing: application to gene microarray data.

Chen-An Tsai1, Huey-miin Hsueh, James J Chen.   

Abstract

Testing for significance with gene expression data from DNA microarray experiments involves simultaneous comparisons of hundreds or thousands of genes. If R denotes the number of rejections (declared significant genes) and V denotes the number of false rejections, then V/R, if R > 0, is the proportion of false rejected hypotheses. This paper proposes a model for the distribution of the number of rejections and the conditional distribution of V given R, V / R. Under the independence assumption, the distribution of R is a convolution of two binomials and the distribution of V / R has a noncentral hypergeometric distribution. Under an equicorrelated model, the distributions are more complex and are also derived. Five false discovery rate probability error measures are considered: FDR = E(V/R), pFDR = E(V/R / R > 0) (positive FDR), cFDR = E(V/R / R = r) (conditional FDR), mFDR = E(V)/E(R) (marginal FDR), and eFDR = E(V)/r (empirical FDR). The pFDR, cFDR, and mFDR are shown to be equivalent under the Bayesian framework, in which the number of true null hypotheses is modeled as a random variable. We present a parametric and a bootstrap procedure to estimate the FDRs. Monte Carlo simulations were conducted to evaluate the performance of these two methods. The bootstrap procedure appears to perform reasonably well, even when the alternative hypotheses are correlated (rho = .25). An example from a toxicogenomic microarray experiment is presented for illustration.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14969487     DOI: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.2003.00123.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  43 in total

1.  Differential functions for the transcription factor E2A in positive and negative gene regulation in pre-B lymphocytes.

Authors:  Stephen Greenbaum; Adam S Lazorchak; Yuan Zhuang
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2004-08-13       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Meta-analysis for pathway enrichment analysis when combining multiple genomic studies.

Authors:  Kui Shen; George C Tseng
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Individual and gender fingerprints in human body odour.

Authors:  Dustin J Penn; Elisabeth Oberzaucher; Karl Grammer; Gottfried Fischer; Helena A Soini; Donald Wiesler; Milos V Novotny; Sarah J Dixon; Yun Xu; Richard G Brereton
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2007-04-22       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Ranking analysis of microarray data: a powerful method for identifying differentially expressed genes.

Authors:  Yuan-De Tan; Myriam Fornage; Yun-Xin Fu
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  2006-09-18       Impact factor: 5.736

5.  Optimum two-stage designs in case-control association studies using false discovery rate.

Authors:  Aya Kuchiba; Noriko Y Tanaka; Yasuo Ohashi
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2006-09-27       Impact factor: 3.172

6.  fdrMotif: identifying cis-elements by an EM algorithm coupled with false discovery rate control.

Authors:  Leping Li; Robert L Bass; Yu Liang
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 6.937

7.  A methylome-wide study of aging using massively parallel sequencing of the methyl-CpG-enriched genomic fraction from blood in over 700 subjects.

Authors:  Joseph L McClay; Karolina A Aberg; Shaunna L Clark; Srilaxmi Nerella; Gaurav Kumar; Lin Y Xie; Alexandra D Hudson; Aki Harada; Christina M Hultman; Patrik K E Magnusson; Patrick F Sullivan; Edwin J C G Van Den Oord
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 6.150

8.  The Beta-Binomial Distribution for Estimating the Number of False Rejections in Microarray Gene Expression Studies.

Authors:  Daniel L Hunt; Cheng Cheng; Stanley Pounds
Journal:  Comput Stat Data Anal       Date:  2009-03-15       Impact factor: 1.681

9.  A censored beta mixture model for the estimation of the proportion of non-differentially expressed genes.

Authors:  Anastasios Markitsis; Yinglei Lai
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  Genomewide association for schizophrenia in the CATIE study: results of stage 1.

Authors:  P F Sullivan; D Lin; J-Y Tzeng; E van den Oord; D Perkins; T S Stroup; M Wagner; S Lee; F A Wright; F Zou; W Liu; A M Downing; J Lieberman; S L Close
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 15.992

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.