Literature DB >> 14963373

Biological age and 12-year cognitive change in older adults: findings from the Victoria Longitudinal Study.

Stuart W S MacDonald1, Roger A Dixon, Anna-Lisa Cohen, Janine E Hazlitt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although recent cross-sectional findings indicate that markers of biological age (BA) mediate chronological age (CA) differences in cognitive performance, little is known about their influence on actual cognitive changes.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this investigation is to examine CA and BA as predictors of 12-year cognitive change in a longitudinal sample of older adults.
METHODS: Data from the Victoria Longitudinal Study (VLS) were examined for 125 adults between 67 and 95 years of age. Biomarkers, including visual and auditory acuity, grip strength, peak expiratory flow, blood pressure, and body mass index, were submitted to a factor analysis and a composite BA variable was computed based on factor loadings. Intraindividual change across 5 waves of measurement (3-year intervals) was examined as a function of CA and BA for 5 cognitive domains: verbal processing speed, working memory, reasoning, episodic memory, and semantic memory.
RESULTS: The latent structure of biomarkers was consistent with previous investigations of functional age and a common factor view of biological aging. Results of hierarchical linear modeling showed that BA predicted actual cognitive change (decline) independent of CA.
CONCLUSIONS: As a predictor of cognitive performance in late life, CA is a proxy for biological and environmental influences. We have shown that biological influences are independent predictors of actual cognitive change in older adults. This supports the view that cognitive decline is not due to aging per se, but rather is likely due to causal factors that operate along the age continuum. Copyright 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14963373     DOI: 10.1159/000075557

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gerontology        ISSN: 0304-324X            Impact factor:   5.140


  31 in total

Review 1.  A four-component model of age-related memory change.

Authors:  M Karl Healey; Michael J Kahana
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Supplementation with eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid reduces high levels of circulating proinflammatory cytokines in aging adults: A randomized, controlled study.

Authors:  Alai Tan; Brent Sullenbarger; Ruchika Prakash; Jodi C McDaniel
Journal:  Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 4.006

3.  Exploring effects of type 2 diabetes on cognitive functioning in older adults.

Authors:  Sophie E Yeung; Ashley L Fischer; Roger A Dixon
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Select aging biomarkers based on telomere length and chronological age to build a biological age equation.

Authors:  Wei-Guang Zhang; Shu-Ying Zhu; Xiao-Juan Bai; De-Long Zhao; Shi-Min Jian; Juan Li; Zuo-Xiang Li; Bo Fu; Guang-Yan Cai; Xue-Feng Sun; Xiang-Mei Chen
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2014-06

5.  Predicting impending death: inconsistency in speed is a selective and early marker.

Authors:  Stuart W S Macdonald; David F Hultsch; Roger A Dixon
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2008-09

6.  Integrating health into cognitive aging: toward a preventive cognitive neuroscience of aging.

Authors:  Avron Spiro; Christopher B Brady
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.077

7.  Linking biological and cognitive aging: toward improving characterizations of developmental time.

Authors:  Stuart W S MacDonald; Correne A DeCarlo; Roger A Dixon
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.077

8.  Comparing Biological Age Estimates Using Domain-Specific Measures From the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging.

Authors:  Chris P Verschoor; Daniel W Belsky; Jinhui Ma; Alan A Cohen; Lauren E Griffith; Parminder Raina
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 6.053

9.  Contrasting olfaction, vision, and audition as predictors of cognitive change and impairment in non-demented older adults.

Authors:  Stuart W S MacDonald; Connor J C Keller; Paul W H Brewster; Roger A Dixon
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Modeling the rate of senescence: can estimated biological age predict mortality more accurately than chronological age?

Authors:  Morgan E Levine
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 6.053

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.