Literature DB >> 14961416

Collaborating to integrate curriculum in primary care medical education: successes and challenges from three US medical schools.

Catherine F Pipas1, Deborah A Peltier, Leslie H Fall, Ardis L Olson, John F Mahoney, Susan E Skochelak, Craig L Gjerde.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Traditional medical school department-based clerkship structures can lead to redundancy and/or gaps in curriculum, inefficient administrative systems, and academic isolation for clerkship directors. This paper describes the approaches, successes, and challenges three institutions experienced when implementing an interdepartmental collaboration to create an integrated primary care clerkship experience.
METHODS: Each school combined family medicine, ambulatory pediatrics, and ambulatory medicine into contiguous clerkship blocks. In all institutions, each clerkship maintained certain distinct features while the integrated aspects contained longitudinal curriculum of certain primary care topics.
RESULTS: Evaluations by students demonstrated favorable responses to the new content and integrated methods of teaching, as did results of the Association of American Medical Colleges graduation survey. Faculty at each institution reported that their multidisciplinary approach has stimulated important educational collaborations, many of which require an economy of scale not often achievable within a single clerkship. These included innovative evaluation/documentation efforts; centralization of administrative tasks; enhanced recruitment, retention, and development of community-based faculty; an increase in the active core group of local and national primary care leaders; and an increase in scholarly activities. The collaborations have not occurred without challenges, primarily in the need for identifying sustainable resources for these and future collaborative educational endeavors.
CONCLUSIONS: The benefits involved in developing an integrated primary care experience include expansion of curriculum content and methods, as well as enhancement of collegial support and resources to community-based and academic faculty. These integrations do, however, bring added challenges, time, and costs to traditional independent clerkships.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14961416

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Med        ISSN: 0742-3225            Impact factor:   1.756


  5 in total

1.  Medical school curriculum characteristics associated with intentions and frequency of tobacco dependence treatment among 3rd year U.S. medical students.

Authors:  Rashelle B Hayes; Alan C Geller; Sybil L Crawford; Denise G Jolicoeur; Linda C Churchill; Kolawole S Okuyemi; Sean P David; Michael Adams; Jonathan Waugh; Sharon S Allen; Frank T Leone; Randy Fauver; Katherine Leung; Qin Liu; Judith K Ockene
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 4.018

2.  Good teachers: substainable models.

Authors:  Kieran Walsh
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 18.000

3.  A qualitative assessment of faculty perspectives of small group teaching experience in Iraq.

Authors:  Abubakir M Saleh; Nazar P Shabila; Ali A Dabbagh; Namir G Al-Tawil; Tariq S Al-Hadithi
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2015-02-15       Impact factor: 2.463

4.  The "general practice class"--an eligible compulsory course in undergraduate medical education: didactical structure, teaching targets and implementation.

Authors:  Claudia Langosch; Jörg-Friedrich Onnasch; Thomas Steger; Andreas Klement; Susanne Grundke
Journal:  GMS Z Med Ausbild       Date:  2012-11-15

5.  Hands-on - general medicine - circuit-training in the auditorium--a practical equivalent to a lecture.

Authors:  Wolfgang A Blank; Hannes Blankenfeld; Anton J Beck; Anna-Maria Frangoulis; Florian Vorderwülbecke; Andreas Fleischmann
Journal:  GMS Z Med Ausbild       Date:  2014-08-15
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.