Literature DB >> 1493717

Return to fertility after removal of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device and Nova-T.

K Andersson1, I Batar, G Rybo.   

Abstract

In a European randomized multicenter study, the efficacy and safety of an intrauterine contraceptive device releasing 20 microgram levonorgestrel/24 hours (LNG-IUD) have been evaluated and compared to the Nova-T. Because the LNG-IUD has a strongly suppressive effect on the endometrium and in some women affects ovarian function, the return to fertility after removal of the IUD was studied. Two-hundred-nine women (71 in the Nova-T and 138 in the LNG-IUD group), who had their IUDs removed because of planning pregnancy, were followed at least 24 months or until termination of pregnancy. For the Nova-T, the cumulative conception gross rate was 71.2/100 women after 12 months (79.7 after 24 months) and for the LNG-IUD 79.1 (86.6 after 24 months). The difference between the devices is not statistically significant, and in spite of the endometrial suppression during use of LNG-IUD, there is no delay of return to fertility and in both groups 96% of the pregnancies occurred during the first year after removal of the device. Eighty-four % of the pregnancies in the Nova-T group and eighty-six % in the LNG-IUD group ended in live births. The results suggest that the endometrium recovers quickly, normal ovulations are established and the fertility seems to be unaffected after use of an LNG-IUD.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biology; Comparative Studies; Contraception; Contraception Termination; Contraceptive Agents; Contraceptive Agents, Female; Contraceptive Agents, Progestin; Contraceptive Methods; Demographic Factors; Endometrial Effects; Endometrium; Family Planning; Fertility; Fertility Measurements; Genitalia; Genitalia, Female; Iud; Iud, Copper Releasing; Iud, Hormone Releasing; Levonorgestrel; Physiology; Population; Population Dynamics; Pregnancy Rate; Research Methodology; Reversibility; Studies; Urogenital System; Uterus

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1493717     DOI: 10.1016/0010-7824(92)90122-a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  13 in total

Review 1.  A risk-benefit assessment of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system.

Authors:  F Sturridge; J Guillebaud
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 2.  Levonorgestrel IUD: is there a long-lasting effect on return to fertility?

Authors:  Erin Dinehart; Ruth B Lathi; Lusine Aghajanova
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Naproxen or estradiol for bleeding and spotting with the levonorgestrel intrauterine system: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Tessa Madden; Sarah Proehl; Jenifer E Allsworth; Gina M Secura; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-09-24       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Benefit-risk assessment of the levonorgestrel intrauterine system in contraception.

Authors:  Tiina Backman
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.606

5.  Fertility and Birth Outcomes in Women With Epilepsy Seeking Pregnancy.

Authors:  Page B Pennell; Jacqueline A French; Cynthia L Harden; Anne Davis; Emilia Bagiella; Evie Andreopoulos; Connie Lau; Nichelle Llewellyn; Sarah Barnard; Stephanie Allien
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 18.302

6.  History of IUD utilization and the risk of preterm birth: a cohort study.

Authors:  Bi Jiang; Wei-Chao He; Jing-Yun Yu; Si-Si Wei; Xin-Jian Zhang
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 2.344

7.  Safety, efficacy and patient acceptability of the contraceptive and non-contraceptive uses of the LNG-IUS.

Authors:  Paula H Bednarek; Jeffrey T Jensen
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2010-08-09

8.  Is antibiotic prophylaxis mandatory after the insertion of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine systemin order to decrease the risk of pelvic inflammatory disease?

Authors:  O Munteanu; L Radulescu; O Bodean; C Cirstoiu; D Secara; M Cirstoiu
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2013-12-25

9.  Review of the safety, efficacy and patient acceptability of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system.

Authors:  Chandra Kailasam; David Cahill
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2008-02-02       Impact factor: 2.711

Review 10.  Understanding benefits and addressing misperceptions and barriers to intrauterine device access among populations in the United States.

Authors:  Jennie Yoost
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 2.711

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.