Literature DB >> 1492214

Medical clinic referral letters. Do they say what they mean? Do they mean what they say?

J A Hodge1, A Jacob, M J Ford, J F Munro.   

Abstract

Consecutive general practitioner referrals to three general medical clinics were examined prospectively to assess whether the reason for referral was being correctly interpreted by consultants. The resultant data revealed that although this was not always the case, such misunderstandings did not appear to affect subsequent management. Explicit reasons for referral in the referral letter however could improve both the quality and value of out-patient consultations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1492214     DOI: 10.1177/003693309203700606

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scott Med J        ISSN: 0036-9330            Impact factor:   0.729


  6 in total

1.  Measuring the quality of referral letters about patients with upper gastrointestinal symptoms.

Authors:  M Jiwa; M Coleman; R K McKinley
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.401

2.  Accuracy of general practitioner referrals to a breast clinic.

Authors:  S K Marsh; T J Archer
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Sexually transmitted diseases and communications with general practitioners.

Authors:  J Winceslaus; J Blount; C Cryer
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.519

4.  Enhancing continuity of information: essential components of a referral document.

Authors:  Whitney Berta; Jan Barnsley; Jeff Bloom; Rhonda Cockerill; Dave Davis; Liisa Jaakkimainen; Anne Marie Mior; Yves Talbot; Eugene Vayda
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 5.  Enhancing continuity of information: essential components of consultation reports.

Authors:  Whitney Berta; Jan Barnsley; Jeff Bloom; Rhonda Cockerill; Dave Davis; Liisa Jaakkimainen; Anne Marie Mior; Yves Talbot; Eugene Vayda
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 6.  Patients' perspectives on the medical primary-secondary care interface: systematic review and synthesis of qualitative research.

Authors:  Rod Sampson; Jamie Cooper; Rosaline Barbour; Rob Polson; Philip Wilson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.