Literature DB >> 1490903

Intracochlear salicylate reduces low-intensity acoustic and cochlear microphonic distortion products.

S G Kujawa1, M Fallon, R P Bobbin.   

Abstract

Salicylate is well-known to produce reversible hearing loss and tinnitus. The site and mechanism of salicylate's ototoxic actions, however, remain unresolved. Recent experiments demonstrating primarily low-intensity effects on cochlear afferent outflow and effects on otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) suggest that salicylate acts to compromise active, energy-enhancing processes within the cochlea (i.e., the active process). We tested this hypothesis by examining the effect of salicylate on distortion product emissions. Distortion product responses to two-tone stimulation were monitored in the guinea pig before, during, and after intracochlear administration of increasing concentrations of salicylate (0.6-5 mM). These responses were recorded as acoustic signals in the ear canal spectrum (ADP), and as present in the cochlear microphonic (CM) recorded from a wire in basal turn scala vestibuli (CMDP). We also recorded the CM response to a single tone. Cochlear perfusion of salicylate resulted in a dose-responsive reduction in ADPs that was greater for low intensities of stimulation. CMDPs also demonstrated a concentration-dependent reduction at low intensities, but were increased slightly, though not significantly, by salicylate when elicited by high intensity primaries. CM was essentially unchanged by intracochlear salicylate. These results are consistent with an action of salicylate that involves the outer hair cells (OHCs) and are in harmony with the hypothesis that salicylate may selectively compromise the active process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1490903     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(92)90169-n

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  11 in total

1.  Different effects of noise and salicylate and their interactions on the guinea pig cochlea.

Authors:  M Aoyagi; M Yoshida; K Makishima
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Inner ear drug delivery via a reciprocating perfusion system in the guinea pig.

Authors:  Zhiqiang Chen; Sharon G Kujawa; Michael J McKenna; Jason O Fiering; Mark J Mescher; Jeffrey T Borenstein; Erin E Leary Swan; William F Sewell
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2005-11-07       Impact factor: 9.776

3.  Salicylate-induced peripheral auditory changes and tonotopic reorganization of auditory cortex.

Authors:  D Stolzberg; G-D Chen; B L Allman; R J Salvi
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 3.590

4.  Effects of salicylate and lanthanides on outer hair cell motility and associated gating charge.

Authors:  S Kakehata; J Santos-Sacchi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1996-08-15       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Using the cochlear microphonic as a tool to evaluate cochlear function in mouse models of hearing.

Authors:  Mary Ann Cheatham; Khurram Naik; Peter Dallos
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-10-19

6.  Salicylate enables cochlear arachidonic-acid-sensitive NMDA receptor responses.

Authors:  Jérôme Ruel; Christian Chabbert; Régis Nouvian; Rim Bendris; Michel Eybalin; Claude Louis Leger; Jérôme Bourien; Marcel Mersel; Jean-Luc Puel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Salicylate toxicity model of tinnitus.

Authors:  Daniel Stolzberg; Richard J Salvi; Brian L Allman
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2012-04-20

Review 8.  What's the buzz? The neuroscience and the treatment of tinnitus.

Authors:  A Henton; T Tzounopoulos
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 46.500

Review 9.  Effects of NSAIDs on the Inner Ear: Possible Involvement in Cochlear Protection.

Authors:  Tomofumi Hoshino; Keiji Tabuchi; Akira Hara
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2010-04-27

Review 10.  Central gain control in tinnitus and hyperacusis.

Authors:  Benjamin D Auerbach; Paulo V Rodrigues; Richard J Salvi
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 4.003

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.