Literature DB >> 14871813

Loss of MSH3 protein expression is frequent in MLH1-deficient colorectal cancer and is associated with disease progression.

Jens Plaschke1, Stefan Krüger, Birgit Jeske, Franz Theissig, Friedmar R Kreuz, Steffen Pistorius, Hans D Saeger, Ingram Iaccarino, Giancarlo Marra, Hans K Schackert.   

Abstract

Mononucleotide repeat sequences are particularly prone to frameshift mutations in tumors with biallelic inactivation of the mismatch repair (MMR) genes MLH1 or MSH2. In these tumors, several genes harboring mononucleotide repeats in their coding region have been proposed as targets involved in tumor progression, among which are also the MMR genes MSH3 and MSH6. We have analyzed the expression of the MSH3 and MSH6 proteins by immunohistochemistry in 31 colorectal carcinomas in which MLH1 was inactivated. Loss of MSH3 expression was identified in 15 tumors (48.5%), whereas all tumors expressed MSH6. Frameshift mutations at coding microsatellites were more frequent in MSH3 (16 of 31) than in MSH6 (3 of 31; Fisher's exact test, P < 0.001). Frameshift mutations and allelic losses of MSH3 were more frequent in MSH3-negative tumors compared with those with normal expression (22 mutations in 30 alleles versus 8 mutations in 28 alleles; chi(2), P = 0.001). Biallelic inactivation was evident or inferred for 60% of MSH3-negative tumors but none of the tumors with normal MSH3 expression. In contrast, we did not identify frameshift mutations in the (A)8 tract of MSH3 in a control group of 18 colorectal carcinomas in which the MMR deficiency was based on the inactivation of MSH2. As it has been suggested that mutations of MSH3 might play a role in tumor progression, we studied the association between MSH3 expression and disease stage assessed by lymph node and distant metastases status. Dukes stages C and D were more frequent in primary tumors with loss of MSH3 expression (9 of 13), compared with tumors with retained expression (1 of 14; Fisher's exact test, P = 0.001), suggesting that MSH3 abrogation may be a predictor of metastatic disease or even favor tumor cell spread in MLH1-deficient colorectal cancers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14871813     DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-03-2807

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  18 in total

1.  Molecular pathways: microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer: prognostic, predictive, and therapeutic implications.

Authors:  Frank A Sinicrope; Daniel J Sargent
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  MSH3 mediates sensitization of colorectal cancer cells to cisplatin, oxaliplatin, and a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor.

Authors:  Masanobu Takahashi; Minoru Koi; Francesc Balaguer; C Richard Boland; Ajay Goel
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  The MutSβ complex is a modulator of p53-driven tumorigenesis through its functions in both DNA double-strand break repair and mismatch repair.

Authors:  J M M van Oers; Y Edwards; R Chahwan; W Zhang; C Smith; X Pechuan; S Schaetzlein; B Jin; Y Wang; A Bergman; M D Scharff; W Edelmann
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 9.867

4.  Aberrant protein expression and frequent allelic loss of MSH3 in colorectal cancer with low-level microsatellite instability.

Authors:  Jens Plaschke; Mark Preußler; Andreas Ziegler; Hans K Schackert
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Exome Sequencing Identifies Biallelic MSH3 Germline Mutations as a Recessive Subtype of Colorectal Adenomatous Polyposis.

Authors:  Ronja Adam; Isabel Spier; Bixiao Zhao; Michael Kloth; Jonathan Marquez; Inga Hinrichsen; Jutta Kirfel; Aylar Tafazzoli; Sukanya Horpaopan; Siegfried Uhlhaas; Dietlinde Stienen; Nicolaus Friedrichs; Janine Altmüller; Andreas Laner; Stefanie Holzapfel; Sophia Peters; Katrin Kayser; Holger Thiele; Elke Holinski-Feder; Giancarlo Marra; Glen Kristiansen; Markus M Nöthen; Reinhard Büttner; Gabriela Möslein; Regina C Betz; Angela Brieger; Richard P Lifton; Stefan Aretz
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 6.  Lynch syndrome genes.

Authors:  Päivi Peltomäki
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.375

7.  Loss of MSH2 and MSH6 due to heterozygous germline defects in MSH3 and MSH6.

Authors:  Monika Morak; Sarah Käsbauer; Martina Kerscher; Andreas Laner; Anke M Nissen; Anna Benet-Pagès; Hans K Schackert; Gisela Keller; Trisari Massdorf; Elke Holinski-Feder
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.375

8.  MSH3 rs26279 polymorphism increases cancer risk: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hui-Kai Miao; Li-Ping Chen; Dong-Ping Cai; Wei-Ju Kong; Li Xiao; Jie Lin
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-09-01

Review 9.  Hereditary ovarian carcinoma: heterogeneity, molecular genetics, pathology, and management.

Authors:  Henry T Lynch; Murray Joseph Casey; Carrie L Snyder; Chhanda Bewtra; Jane F Lynch; Matthew Butts; Andrew K Godwin
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2009-02-21       Impact factor: 6.603

10.  Expression of mismatch repair proteins, beta catenin, and E cadherin in intestinal-type sinonasal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  B Perez-Ordonez; N N Huynh; K W Berean; R C K Jordan
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.