Literature DB >> 1486861

Intragenomic repair heterogeneity of DNA damage.

D A Scicchitano1, P C Hanawalt.   

Abstract

The mutagenic and carcinogenic consequences of unrepaired DNA damage depend upon its precise location with respect to the relevant genomic sites. Therefore, it is important to learn the fine structure of DNA damage, in particular, proto-oncogenes, tumor-suppressor genes, and other DNA sequences implicated in tumorigenesis. Both the introduction and the repair of many types of DNA lesions are heterogeneous with respect to chromatin structure and/or gene activity. For example, cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers are removed more efficiently from the transcribed than the nontranscribed strand of the dhfr gene in Chinese hamster ovary cells. In contrast, preferential strand repair of alkali-labile sites is not found at this locus. In mouse 3T3 cells, dimers are more efficiently removed from an expressed proto-oncogene than from a silent one. Persistent damage in nontranscribed domains may account for genomic instability in those regions, particularly during cell proliferation as lesions are encountered by replication forks. The preferential repair of certain lesions in the transcribed strands of active genes results in a bias toward mutagenesis owing to persistent lesions in the nontranscribed strands. Risk assessment in environmental genetic toxicology requires assays that determine effective levels of DNA damage of producing malignancy. The existence of nonrandom repair in the mammalian genome casts doubt on the reliability of overall indicators of carcinogen-DNA binding and lesion repair for such determinations. Tissue-specific and cell-specific differences in the coordinate regulation of gene expression and DNA repair may account for corresponding differences in the carcinogenic response to particular environmental agents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1486861      PMCID: PMC1519617          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.929845

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  54 in total

1.  Lack of sequence-specific removal of N-methylpurines from cellular DNA.

Authors:  D A Scicchitano; P C Hanawalt
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1990 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.433

2.  Preferential DNA repair of alkali-labile sites within the active insulin gene.

Authors:  S P LeDoux; N J Patton; J W Nelson; W A Bohr; G L Wilson
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1990-09-05       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Preferential repair of DNA damage on the transcribed strand of the human metallothionein genes requires RNA polymerase II.

Authors:  S A Leadon; D A Lawrence
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 2.433

4.  Sites of preferential induction of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers in the nontranscribed strand of lacI correspond with sites of UV-induced mutation in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  D R Koehler; S S Awadallah; B W Glickman
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1991-06-25       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 5.  DNA repair enzymes.

Authors:  T Lindahl
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 23.643

6.  DNA strand-specific mutations induced by (+/-)-3 alpha,4 beta-dihydroxy- 1 alpha,2 alpha-epoxy-1,2,3,4-tetrahydrobenzo[c]phenanthrene in the dihydrofolate reductase gene.

Authors:  A M Carothers; J Mucha; D Grunberger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-07-01       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Differential introduction of DNA damage and repair in mammalian genes transcribed by RNA polymerases I and II.

Authors:  J M Vos; E L Wauthier
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  DNA repair in a small yeast plasmid folded into chromatin.

Authors:  M J Smerdon; J Bedoyan; F Thoma
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1990-04-25       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Transcriptionally active and inactive genes are similarly modified by chemical carcinogens or X-ray in normal human fibroblasts.

Authors:  K Nose; O Nikaido
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1984-04-05

10.  Gene- and strand-specific repair in vitro: partial purification of a transcription-repair coupling factor.

Authors:  C P Selby; A Sancar
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-09-15       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Role of transcription-coupled DNA repair in susceptibility to environmental carcinogenesis.

Authors:  P C Hanawalt
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 2.  Transcription and DNA damage: a link to a kink.

Authors:  D A Scicchitano; I Mellon
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 9.031

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.