Literature DB >> 1484476

Combining and comparing area estimates across studies or strata.

D K McClish1.   

Abstract

A method for combining and comparing medical tests across studies or strata is presented. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve is the parameter of interest to be used for comparison. The combined area is a weighted average of the areas under the curve in each study or stratum. A chi-square test for equality of areas across strata can be used to compare the areas. The power of the test is also explored. The methods presented are simple and require only knowledge of estimates of area and their standard errors. Either parametric or nonparametric estimates of the area can be used.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1484476     DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9201200405

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  9 in total

Review 1.  Performance of EuroSCORE in CABG and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: single institution experience and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alessandro Parolari; Lorenzo L Pesce; Matteo Trezzi; Claudia Loardi; Samer Kassem; Claudio Brambillasca; Bruno Miguel; Elena Tremoli; Paolo Biglioli; Francesco Alamanni
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 29.983

2.  International comparison of clinicians' ability to identify depression in primary care: meta-analysis and meta-regression of predictors.

Authors:  Alex J Mitchell; Sanjay Rao; Amol Vaze
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Estimation of ROC curve with complex survey data.

Authors:  Wenliang Yao; Zhaohai Li; Barry I Graubard
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 4.  Accuracy of stroke volume variation in predicting fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhongheng Zhang; Baolong Lu; Xiaoyan Sheng; Ni Jin
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2011-09-04       Impact factor: 2.078

5.  Proportional odds ratio model for comparison of diagnostic tests in meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mir Said Siadaty; Jianfen Shu
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2004-12-10       Impact factor: 4.615

6.  Plasma chitotriosidase activity versus CCL18 level for assessing type I Gaucher disease severity: protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis of individual participant data.

Authors:  Tatiana Raskovalova; Patrick B Deegan; Ruby Yang; Elena Pavlova; Jérome Stirnemann; José Labarère; Ari Zimran; Pramod K Mistry; Marc Berger
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-20

7.  Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: didactic guidelines.

Authors:  Walter L Devillé; Frank Buntinx; Lex M Bouter; Victor M Montori; Henrica C W de Vet; Danielle A W M van der Windt; P Dick Bezemer
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2002-07-03       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 8.  Cochrane diagnostic test accuracy reviews.

Authors:  Mariska M G Leeflang; Jonathan J Deeks; Yemisi Takwoingi; Petra Macaskill
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2013-10-07

9.  Application of weighting methods for presenting risk-of-bias assessments in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy studies.

Authors:  Yasaman Vali; Mariska M G Leeflang; Patrick M M Bossuyt
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2021-06-27
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.