Literature DB >> 1482753

Comparison of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis patient survival with evaluation of trends during the 1980s.

C B Nelson1, F K Port, R A Wolfe, K E Guire.   

Abstract

To evaluate the mortality of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients relative to hemodialysis (HD) patients, all Michigan residents 20 to 59 yr of age who initiated therapy for ESRD during the 1980s (N = 4,288) were studied. The study population was stratified by primary renal diagnosis (glomerulonephritis, hypertension, diabetes, other), and analyses were conducted within each group by Cox proportional hazards methods controlling for age, race, sex, and year in which chronic dialysis was initiated. Intent-to-treat (ITT) and treatment history (RxHx) censoring criteria were used. For patients with hypertension or other reported causes of ESRD, there was no significant difference in CAPD and HD patient mortality (relative risk (RR) = 0.99 and 1.05, respectively). In the ITT analysis, both glomerulonephritic (RR = 0.73; P = 0.10) and diabetic patients using CAPD experienced mortality rates lower than their HD counterparts. Among diabetics, this difference ranged from a RR of 0.40 to 0.70, being lowest for younger diabetics and statistically significant (P < or = 0.05) for ages 20 to 52 yr. Evaluation of mortality trends showed a significant (P < 0.01) decrease in diabetic CAPD mortality rates during the decade, whereas diabetic HD mortality rates increased (P = 0.06). Among diabetics, men had higher mortality rates than women (ITT--RxHx; RR = 1.22 to 1.27; P < 0.001) and white patients had higher mortality rates than black patients (ITT--RxHx, RR = 1.34 to 1.44; P < 0.001). Differences in mortality by sex and race were not found among nondiabetics, but mortality did increase significantly with age in all groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1482753     DOI: 10.1681/ASN.V351147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol        ISSN: 1046-6673            Impact factor:   10.121


  6 in total

1.  Patient able to stay on peritoneal dialysis after retroperitoneal-approach radical nephrectomy.

Authors:  Chiao-Ying Hsu; Ming-Fang Hsieh; Chiao-Yin Sun; Cheng-Jia Lin; Jun-De Wu; Mai-Szu Wu
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.756

2.  Relationship between dialysis modality and mortality.

Authors:  Stephen P McDonald; Mark R Marshall; David W Johnson; Kevan R Polkinghorne
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 10.121

3.  Association of dialysis modality and cardiovascular mortality in incident dialysis patients.

Authors:  David W Johnson; Hannah Dent; Carmel M Hawley; Stephen P McDonald; Johan B Rosman; Fiona G Brown; Kym Bannister; Kathryn J Wiggins
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2009-09-03       Impact factor: 8.237

4.  Peritoneal dialysis in diabetics: there is room for more.

Authors:  P Cotovio; A Rocha; A Rodrigues
Journal:  Int J Nephrol       Date:  2011-10-16

5.  Comparison of plasma amino acid concentrations in end-stage renal disease patients on hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  D H Kim; D H Yang; S Y Hong
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.884

6.  Cost-effectiveness of hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis: A national cohort study with 14 years follow-up and matched for comorbidities and propensity score.

Authors:  Yu-Tzu Chang; Jing-Shiang Hwang; Shih-Yuan Hung; Min-Sung Tsai; Jia-Ling Wu; Junne-Ming Sung; Jung-Der Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.