Literature DB >> 1478225

Corpus cavernosum invasion and tumor grade in the prediction of lymph node condition in penile carcinoma.

E Solsona1, I Iborra, J V Ricós, J L Monrós, R Dumont, J Casanova, C Calabuig.   

Abstract

Of the 101 patients with penile cancer, we have analyzed 66 from whom we had enough information: 42 (63.3%) patients with corpora cavernosa invasion (T2-3) and 24 (36.6%) without (T1). With respect to the tumor grade, in 36 (54.3%) patients it was well differentiated (G I), in 23 (34.8%) moderately (G II) and in 7 (10.6%) poorly differentiated (G III). We also analyzed the inguinal lymph node condition. Of the 66 patients, 28 (42.4%) developed nodal metastases, and 38 (57.6%) were considered free of nodal metastases and disease with an average follow-up of 76.2 months (range 38-192). The presence of metastatic nodes was influenced by both tumor stage and grade with significant differences between T2-3 and T1 (p = 0.001) and between G II-III and G I (p < 0.01), but each of them alone was not a sufficiently reliable predictive factor. In order to associate local stages and tumor grades in relation to the presence of metastatic nodes, we checked that none of the patients with T1, G I (group 1) developed nodal metastases, and therefore, 'wait and see' should be the suitable approach. Twenty (80%) of the patients with T2-3, G II-III (group 2) developed metastatic lymph nodes, thus, in this group, an early lymphadenectomy should be performed. In the remaining 22 patients with T1, G II-III and T2, G I (group 3), 8 (36.4%) showed metastatic lymph nodes; in this group, other factors such as age, cultural level and obesity should be taken into account when deciding on lymphadenectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1478225     DOI: 10.1159/000474736

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  10 in total

1.  Validation of predictors for lymph node status in penile cancer: Results from a population-based cohort.

Authors:  X Melody Qu; D Robert Siemens; Alexander V Louie; Darwin Yip; Aamer Mahmud
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Management of carcinoma of the penis: Consensus statement from the Canadian Association of Genitourinary Medical Oncologists (CAGMO).

Authors:  Suzanne Richter; J Dean Ruether; Lori Wood; Christina Canil; Patricia Moretto; Peter Venner; Joel Gingerich; Urban Emmenegger; Andrea Eisen; Pawel Zalewski; Anthony Joshua; Som Dave Mukherjee; Daniel Heng; Piotr Czaykowski; Denis Soulieres; Norman Blais; Ricardo Rendon; Neil Fleshner; Juanita M Crook; Srikala S Sridhar
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 3.  How accurate are present risk group assignment tools in penile cancer?

Authors:  Vincenzo Ficarra; G Novara; R Boscolo-Berto; W Artibani; M W Kattan
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Shortcomings of the current TNM classification for penile carcinoma: time for a change?

Authors:  Joost A P Leijte; Simon Horenblas
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-08-09       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Extra-anatomical transobturator bypass graft for femoral artery involvement by metastatic carcinoma of the penis: report of five patients.

Authors:  Ubirajara Ferreira; Leonardo Oliveira Reis; Lia Yumi Ikari; Walter da Silva; Wagner Eduardo Matheus; Fernandes Denardi; Rafael Mamprim Stopiglia; Fábio Husseman Menezes
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-06-26       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Carcinoma penis: How late can inguinal nodal metastases occur?

Authors:  Anil Kamath; T B Yuvaraja; H B Tongaonkar; S Kane
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2007-07

Review 7.  The role of pathologic prognostic factors in squamous cell carcinoma of the penis.

Authors:  Antonio L Cubilla
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Predictive pathological factors of lymph nodes involvement in the squamous cell carcinoma of the penis.

Authors:  Vincenzo Ficarra; Guido Martignoni; Nicola Maffei; Maria Angela Cerruto; Giacomo Novara; Stefano Cavalleri; Walter Artibani
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.370

9.  Histological subtype is a significant predictor for inguinal lymph node metastasis in patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Jin-You Wang; Ming-Zhu Gao; De-Xin Yu; Dong-Dong Xie; Yi Wang; Liang-Kuan Bi; Tao Zhang; De-Mao Ding
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2018 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.285

10.  Prognostic Factors of Penile Cancer and the Efficacy of Adjuvant Treatment after Penectomy: Results from a Multi-institution Study.

Authors:  Jong Won Kim; Young Sig Kim; Woo Jin Ko; Young Deuk Choi; Sung Joon Hong; Byung Ha Chung; Kwang Suk Lee
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 2.153

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.