Literature DB >> 1477248

Evaluation of new anti-infective drugs for the treatment of intraabdominal infections. Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Food and Drug Administration.

J S Solomkin1, D L Hemsell, R Sweet, F Tally, J Bartlett.   

Abstract

These guidelines deal with the evaluation of anti-infective drugs for the treatment of intraabdominal infections. The clinical entities consist of infections arising from any part of the gastrointestinal tract, from the distal esophagus to the colon. These include surgical infections of the bowel, biliary tree, liver, spleen, and pancreas. Virtually all intraabdominal infections are due to multiple microorganisms resident in the gastrointestinal tract; these include aerobes and facultative and obligate anaerobes. Infections are classified as complicated (requiring an operative procedure), uncomplicated (managed medically), and postoperative wound (the operative procedure should be curative, but anti-infective drugs are used to prevent further infection at the site). Clinical criteria are paramount for entry into a study and for evaluation of efficacy. For complicated infections an adequate operation is an important determinant of outcome and needs assessment. Cultures of purulent intraabdominal fluid or abscess material are the only valid microbiologic indicators of infection. The acute physiology and chronic health evaluation score is useful in defining the severity of acute illness. The control regimen should consist of effective, established drugs and surgical procedures for the condition. Duration of therapy for complicated infections is usually 5-14 days; for uncomplicated infections, 3-7 days; and for postoperative wound infection, 2-5 days. Periodic assessment of safety and efficacy must be conducted during therapy. The outcome at final assessment is cure, failure, or indeterminate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1477248     DOI: 10.1093/clind/15.supplement_1.s33

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Infect Dis        ISSN: 1058-4838            Impact factor:   9.079


  14 in total

1.  Risk factors leading to clinical failure in the treatment of intra-abdominal or skin/soft tissue infections.

Authors:  M E Falagas; L Barefoot; J Griffith; R Ruthazar; D R Snydman
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Inappropriate initial treatment of secondary intra-abdominal infections leads to increased risk of clinical failure and costs.

Authors:  Miriam C J M Sturkenboom; Wim G Goettsch; Gino Picelli; Bas in 't Veld; Don D Yin; Romy B de Jong; Peter M N Y H Go; Ron M C Herings
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Monotherapy with a broad-spectrum beta-lactam is as effective as its combination with an aminoglycoside in treatment of severe generalized peritonitis: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. The Severe Generalized Peritonitis Study Group.

Authors:  H Dupont; C Carbon; J Carlet
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Results of a clinical trial of clinafloxacin versus imipenem/cilastatin for intraabdominal infections.

Authors:  J S Solomkin; S E Wilson; N V Christou; O D Rotstein; E P Dellinger; R S Bennion; R Pak; K Tack
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Effect of inappropriate initial empiric antibiotic therapy on outcome of patients with community-acquired intra-abdominal infections requiring surgery.

Authors:  K Krobot; D Yin; Q Zhang; S Sen; A Altendorf-Hofmann; J Scheele; W Sendt
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2004-08-21       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  Prospective randomized comparison of imipenem-cilastatin and piperacillin-tazobactam in nosocomial pneumonia or peritonitis.

Authors:  C Jaccard; N Troillet; S Harbarth; G Zanetti; D Aymon; R Schneider; R Chiolero; B Ricou; J Romand; O Huber; P Ambrosetti; G Praz; D Lew; J Bille; M P Glauser; A Cometta
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Ciprofloxacin vs. cefotaxime regimens for the treatment of intra-abdominal infections.

Authors:  J A Hoogkamp-Korstanje
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1995 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.553

8.  Ertapenem versus piperacillin/tazobactam in the treatment of complicated intraabdominal infections: results of a double-blind, randomized comparative phase III trial.

Authors:  Joseph S Solomkin; Albert E Yellin; Ori D Rotstein; Nicolas V Christou; E Patchen Dellinger; Jose M Tellado; Osvaldo Malafaia; Alvaro Fernandez; Kyuran A Choe; Alexandra Carides; Vilas Satishchandran; Hedy Teppler
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Results of a randomized trial comparing sequential intravenous/oral treatment with ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole to imipenem/cilastatin for intra-abdominal infections. The Intra-Abdominal Infection Study Group.

Authors:  J S Solomkin; H H Reinhart; E P Dellinger; J M Bohnen; O D Rotstein; S B Vogel; H H Simms; C S Hill; H S Bjornson; D C Haverstock; H O Coulter; R M Echols
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 10.  Piperacillin/tazobactam. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic potential.

Authors:  H M Bryson; R N Brogden
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.