Literature DB >> 14767284

Lymphovascular invasion is a pathological feature of biologically aggressive disease in patients treated with radical prostatectomy.

Shahrokh F Shariat1, Seyed M Khoddami, Hossein Saboorian, Kenneth S Koeneman, Arthur I Sagalowsky, Jeffrey A Cadeddu, John D McConnell, Marisa N Holmes, Claus G Roehrborn.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: We examined whether invasion of lymphatic and/or vascular vessels (LVI), or perineural spaces (PNI) is associated with prostate cancer features and outcome.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 630 consecutive men underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically localized disease. LVI and PNI examination was part of the routine specimen evaluation.
RESULTS: Foci of LVI were identified in 32 patients (5%) and 381 (60.5%) had PNI. LVI and PNI were associated with clinical stage T2 disease, higher biopsy and final Gleason sum, extraprostatic extension, seminal vesicle involvement, positive surgical margins and a higher percent of positive biopsy cores (p <0.001). LVI was associated with metastases to regional lymph nodes and higher preoperative serum prostate specific antigen (p <0.001 and 0.004, respectively). PNI and LVI were associated with an increased risk of rapid biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy on univariate (p <0.001 and 0.001, respectively) but not on multivariate analysis. LVI was associated with shorter prostate specific antigen doubling time after biochemical progression (p = 0.012) and higher probabilities of failed local salvage radiation therapy (p = 0.0169), distant metastases (p <0.001) and death (p <0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Only LVI is associated with metastases to regional and distant sites, and most importantly with overall survival. LVI and PNI are associated with established markers of biologically aggressive disease and rapid biochemical progression in patients who underwent radical prostatectomy. Our findings support the routine evaluation of LVI status in radical prostatectomy specimens and its inclusion in predictive models for clinical outcomes, since it appears to be a pathological marker of the lethal phenotype of prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14767284     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000113249.82533.28

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  27 in total

Review 1.  Histopathology reporting of prostate needle biopsies. 2005 update.

Authors:  Rodolfo Montironi; Remigio Vela Navarrete; Antonio Lopez-Beltran; Roberta Mazzucchelli; Gregor Mikuz; Aldo V Bono
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2006-04-22       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 2.  The prognostic role of lymphovascular invasion in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.

Authors:  Romain Mathieu; Ilaria Lucca; Morgan Rouprêt; Alberto Briganti; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 3.  Prognostic significance of lymphovascular invasion in radical prostatectomy specimens.

Authors:  David S Yee; Shahrokh F Shariat; William T Lowrance; Alexandra C Maschino; Caroline J Savage; Angel M Cronin; Peter T Scardino; James A Eastham
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 5.588

4.  Squamous cell carcinoma of the tonsil managed by conventional surgery and postoperative radiation.

Authors:  Rahmatullah Rahmati; Snjezana Dogan; Owen Pyke; Frank Palmer; Mahmoud Awad; Nancy Lee; Dennis H Kraus; Jatin P Shah; Snehal G Patel; Ian Ganly
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 3.147

5.  The significance of micro-lymphatic invasion and pathological Gleason score in prostate cancer patients with pathologically organ-confined disease and negative surgical margins after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Takeshi Hashimoto; Jun Nakashima; Rie Inoue; Osamu Komori; Yuri Yamaguchi; Takeshi Kashima; Naoya Satake; Yoshihiro Nakagami; Kazunori Namiki; Toshitaka Nagao; Yoshio Ohno
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 6.  Extraprostatic extension in prostate cancer: primer for radiologists.

Authors:  Alice C Shieh; Ezgi Guler; Vijayanadh Ojili; Raj Mohan Paspulati; Robin Elliott; Nikhil H Ramaiya; Sree Harsha Tirumani
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-12

7.  Lymphovascular invasion is significantly associated with biochemical relapse after radical prostatectomy even in patients with pT2N0 negative resection margin.

Authors:  K Mitsuzuka; S Narita; T Koie; Y Kaiho; N Tsuchiya; T Yoneyama; N Kakoi; S Kawamura; T Tochigi; C Ohyama; T Habuchi; Y Arai
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 5.554

8.  Expression of urokinase-type plasminogen activator system in non-metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Shoji Kimura; David D'Andrea; Takehiro Iwata; Beat Foerster; Florian Janisch; Mehdi Kardoust Parizi; Marco Moschini; Alberto Briganti; Marko Babjuk; Piotr Chlosta; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Dmitry Enikeev; Leonid M Rapoport; Veronica Seebacher; Shin Egawa; Mohammad Abufaraj; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 9.  Comparative effectiveness of robotic and open radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Rodrigo Rodrigues Pessoa; Paul Maroni; Janet Kukreja; Simon P Kim
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-05

10.  Salvage radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy: outcomes and prognostic factors especially focusing on pathological findings.

Authors:  Satoko Hayashi; Keiji Hayashi; Ryo-ichi Yoshimura; Hitoshi Masuda; Kazunori Kihara; Hitoshi Shibuya
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 2.724

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.