Literature DB >> 14766776

Stent design properties and deployment ratio influence indexes of wall shear stress: a three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics investigation within a normal artery.

John F LaDisa1, Lars E Olson, Ismail Guler, Douglas A Hettrick, Said H Audi, Judy R Kersten, David C Warltier, Paul S Pagel.   

Abstract

Restenosis limits the effectiveness of stents, but the mechanisms responsible for this phenomenon remain incompletely described. Stent geometry and expansion during deployment produce alterations in vascular anatomy that may adversely affect wall shear stress (WSS) and correlate with neointimal hyperplasia. These considerations have been neglected in previous computational fluid dynamics models of stent hemodynamics. Thus we tested the hypothesis that deployment diameter and stent strut properties (e.g., number, width, and thickness) influence indexes of WSS predicted with three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics. Simulations were based on canine coronary artery diameter measurements. Stent-to-artery ratios of 1.1 or 1.2:1 were modeled, and computational vessels containing four or eight struts of two widths (0.197 or 0.329 mm) and two thicknesses (0.096 or 0.056 mm) subjected to an inlet velocity of 0.105 m/s were examined. WSS and spatial WSS gradients were calculated and expressed as a percentage of the stent and vessel area. Reducing strut thickness caused regions subjected to low WSS (<5 dyn/cm(2)) to decrease by approximately 87%. Increasing the number of struts produced a 2.75-fold increase in exposure to low WSS. Reducing strut width also caused a modest increase in the area of the vessel experiencing low WSS. Use of a 1.2:1 deployment ratio increased exposure to low WSS by 12-fold compared with stents implanted in a 1.1:1 stent-to-vessel ratio. Thinner struts caused a modest reduction in the area of the vessel subjected to elevated WSS gradients, but values were similar for the other simulations. The results suggest that stent designs that reduce strut number and thickness are less likely to subject the vessel to distributions of WSS associated with neointimal hyperplasia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14766776     DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01329.2003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN: 0161-7567


  20 in total

Review 1.  Stents for intracranial wide-necked aneurysms: more than mechanical protection.

Authors:  Isabel Wanke; Michael Forsting
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2008-09-20       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Interactive virtual stent planning for the treatment of coarctation of the aorta.

Authors:  Mathias Neugebauer; Martin Glöckler; Leonid Goubergrits; Marcus Kelm; Titus Kuehne; Anja Hennemuth
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-05-16       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 3.  Computational Fluid Dynamics and Additive Manufacturing to Diagnose and Treat Cardiovascular Disease.

Authors:  Amanda Randles; David H Frakes; Jane A Leopold
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 19.536

4.  Quantification of local hemodynamic alterations caused by virtual implantation of three commercially available stents for the treatment of aortic coarctation.

Authors:  Sung Kwon; Jeffrey A Feinstein; Ronak J Dholakia; John F Ladisa
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 1.655

5.  Simulation based planning of surgical interventions in pediatric cardiology.

Authors:  Alison L Marsden
Journal:  Phys Fluids (1994)       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 3.521

6.  Comparison of near-wall hemodynamic parameters in stented artery models.

Authors:  Nandini Duraiswamy; Richard T Schoephoerster; James E Moore
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.097

7.  Patient-Specific Simulations Reveal Significant Differences in Mechanical Stimuli in Venous and Arterial Coronary Grafts.

Authors:  Abhay B Ramachandra; Andrew M Kahn; Alison L Marsden
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 8.  Biomechanical issues in endovascular device design.

Authors:  James E Moore
Journal:  J Endovasc Ther       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.487

9.  Comparison of two stents in modifying cerebral aneurysm hemodynamics.

Authors:  Minsuok Kim; Dale B Taulbee; Markus Tremmel; Hui Meng
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-02-09       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 10.  Structural Design of Vascular Stents: A Review.

Authors:  Chen Pan; Yafeng Han; Jiping Lu
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 2.891

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.