Literature DB >> 14765954

Perceptual and oculomotor evidence of limitations on processing accelerating motion.

Scott N J Watamaniuk1, Stephen J Heinen.   

Abstract

Psychophysical studies have demonstrated that humans are less sensitive to image acceleration than to image speed (e.g., Gottsdanker, 1956; Werkhoven, Snippe, & Toet, 1992). Because there is evidence that a common motion-processing stage subserves perception and pursuit (e.g., Watamaniuk & Heinen, 1999), either pursuit should be similarly impaired in discriminating acceleration or it must receive input from a system different from the one that processes visual motion for perception. We assessed the sensitivity of pursuit to acceleration or speed, and compared the results with those obtained in perceptual experiments done with similar stimuli and tasks. Specifically, observers pursued or made psychophysical judgments of targets that moved at randomly selected base speeds and subsequent accelerations. Oculomotor and psychophysical discrimination were compared by analyzing performance for the entire stimulus set sorted by either target acceleration or speed. Thresholds for pursuit and perception were higher for target acceleration than speed, further evidence that a common motion-processing stage limits the performance of both systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14765954     DOI: 10.1167/3.11.5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  22 in total

1.  Base on balls for the Chapman strategy: reassessing Brouwer, Brenner, and Smeets (2002).

Authors:  Frank T J M Zaal; Raoul M Bongers; Gert-Jan Pepping; Reinoud J Bootsma
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Detection of speed changes during pursuit eye movements.

Authors:  Thomas Haarmeier; Peter Thier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-19       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Visuo-motor coordination and internal models for object interception.

Authors:  Myrka Zago; Joseph McIntyre; Patrice Senot; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Eye movements: the past 25 years.

Authors:  Eileen Kowler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Discrimination of curvature from motion during smooth pursuit eye movements and fixation.

Authors:  Nicholas M Ross; Alexander Goettker; Alexander C Schütz; Doris I Braun; Karl R Gegenfurtner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Aperture extent and stimulus speed affect the perception of visual acceleration.

Authors:  Alexandra S Mueller; Esther G González; Chris McNorgan; Martin J Steinbach; Brian Timney
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-11-19       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Choosing a foveal goal recruits the saccadic system during smooth pursuit.

Authors:  Stephen J Heinen; Jeremy B Badler; Scott N J Watamaniuk
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Catching what we can't see: manual interception of occluded fly-ball trajectories.

Authors:  Gianfranco Bosco; Sergio Delle Monache; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Bayesian modeling of perceived surface slant from actively-generated and passively-observed optic flow.

Authors:  Corrado Caudek; Carlo Fantoni; Fulvio Domini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Is acceleration used for ocular pursuit and spatial estimation during prediction motion?

Authors:  Simon J Bennett; Nicolas Benguigui
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.