OBJECTIVES: To investigate the association between APOE genotype and cognitive and emotional outcome following spontaneous subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Neuropsychological assessments were conducted with 70 SAH survivors derived from a consecutive series of neurosurgical admissions. Outcomes, including cognitive tests, health questionnaires and Glasgow Outcome Scale at a mean of 16 months after SAH, were compared with presence or absence of the epsilon4 allele. RESULTS: There was no evidence that SAH survivors possessing the epsilon4 allele had poorer outcome. The only suggestion of an association between the epsilon4 allele and outcome was in a subgroup of patients with a Fisher grade 4 haemorrhage, although this trend did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, possession of the APOE epsilon4 allele is not significantly associated with neuropsychological outcome following SAH. However, there may be an effect amongst those with a Fisher grade 4 haemorrhage.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the association between APOE genotype and cognitive and emotional outcome following spontaneous subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Neuropsychological assessments were conducted with 70 SAH survivors derived from a consecutive series of neurosurgical admissions. Outcomes, including cognitive tests, health questionnaires and Glasgow Outcome Scale at a mean of 16 months after SAH, were compared with presence or absence of the epsilon4 allele. RESULTS: There was no evidence that SAH survivors possessing the epsilon4 allele had poorer outcome. The only suggestion of an association between the epsilon4 allele and outcome was in a subgroup of patients with a Fisher grade 4 haemorrhage, although this trend did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, possession of the APOE epsilon4 allele is not significantly associated with neuropsychological outcome following SAH. However, there may be an effect amongst those with a Fisher grade 4 haemorrhage.
Authors: Eric Milner; Jacob C Holtzman; Stuart Friess; Richard E Hartman; David L Brody; Byung H Han; Gregory J Zipfel Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2014-06-18 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Andrew F Ducruet; Paul R Gigante; Zachary L Hickman; Brad E Zacharia; Eric J Arias; Bartosz T Grobelny; Justin W Gorski; Stephan A Mayer; E Sander Connolly Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2010-01-13 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Caron M Hong; Cigdem Tosun; David B Kurland; Volodymyr Gerzanich; David Schreibman; J Marc Simard Journal: Biomarkers Date: 2014-02-05 Impact factor: 2.658
Authors: Matthew J Gallek; Yvette P Conley; Paula R Sherwood; Michael B Horowitz; Amin Kassam; Sheila A Alexander Journal: Biol Res Nurs Date: 2008-11-17 Impact factor: 2.522
Authors: Claudia Fanizzi; Andrew D Sauerbeck; Mihika Gangolli; Gregory J Zipfel; David L Brody; Terrance T Kummer Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-08-08 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Daniel T Laskowitz; Haichen Wang; Tony Chen; David T Lubkin; Viviana Cantillana; Tian Ming Tu; Dawn Kernagis; Guanen Zhou; Gary Macy; Bradley J Kolls; Hana N Dawson Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-04-21 Impact factor: 4.379