Literature DB >> 14763759

Contrast sensitivity loss with aging: sampling efficiency and equivalent noise at different spatial frequencies.

Shahina Pardhan1.   

Abstract

The relative contributions of optical and neural factors to the decrease in visual function with aging were investigated by measurement of contrast detection at three different spatial frequencies, in the presence of external noise, on young and older subjects. Contrast detection in noise functions allows two parameters to be measured: sampling efficiency, which indicates neural changes, and equivalent noise, which demonstrates optical effects. Contrast thresholds were measured in the presence of four levels (including zero) of externally added visual noise. Measurements were obtained from eight young and eight older visually normal observers. Compared with young subjects, older subjects showed significantly (p < 0.05) lower sampling efficiencies at spatial frequencies of 1 and 4 cycles per degree (c/deg) and significantly higher equivalent noise levels for gratings of 10 c/deg. Neural and optical factors affect contrast sensitivity loss with aging differently, depending on the spatial frequency tested, implying the existence of different mechanisms.

Year:  2004        PMID: 14763759     DOI: 10.1364/josaa.21.000169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis        ISSN: 1084-7529            Impact factor:   2.129


  14 in total

1.  Three-dimensional relationship between high-order root-mean-square wavefront error, pupil diameter, and aging.

Authors:  Raymond A Applegate; William J Donnelly; Jason D Marsack; Darren E Koenig; Konrad Pesudovs
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.129

2.  Reduction in direction discrimination with age and slow speed is due to both increased internal noise and reduced sampling efficiency.

Authors:  Lotte-Guri Bogfjellmo; Peter J Bex; Helle K Falkenberg
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Reduced Contrast Sensitivity is Associated With Elevated Equivalent Intrinsic Noise in Type 2 Diabetics Who Have Mild or No Retinopathy.

Authors:  J Jason McAnany; Jason C Park
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Efficient Characterization and Classification of Contrast Sensitivity Functions in Aging.

Authors:  Fang-Fang Yan; Fang Hou; Zhong-Lin Lu; Xiaopeng Hu; Chang-Bing Huang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Aging affects gain and internal noise in the visual system.

Authors:  Fang-Fang Yan; Fang Hou; Hongyu Lu; Jia Yang; Lijun Chen; Yifan Wu; Ge Chen; Chang-Bing Huang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Age-dependency in binocular rivalry is reflected by exclusive percepts, not mixed percepts.

Authors:  Elahe Arani; Raymond van Ee; Richard van Wezel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Averaging, not internal noise, limits the development of coherent motion processing.

Authors:  Catherine Manning; Steven C Dakin; Marc S Tibber; Elizabeth Pellicano
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 6.464

Review 8.  Perception and Cognition in the Ageing Brain: A Brief Review of the Short- and Long-Term Links between Perceptual and Cognitive Decline.

Authors:  Katherine L Roberts; Harriet A Allen
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 5.750

9.  What Do Contrast Threshold Equivalent Noise Studies Actually Measure? Noise vs. Nonlinearity in Different Masking Paradigms.

Authors:  Alex S Baldwin; Daniel H Baker; Robert F Hess
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Age-related differences in the legibility of degraded text.

Authors:  Benjamin Wolfe; Jonathan Dobres; Anna Kosovicheva; Ruth Rosenholtz; Bryan Reimer
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2016-12-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.