Literature DB >> 14762411

Comparison between standard Goldmann applanation prism and disposable applanation prism in tonometry.

S Goel1, C Chua, B Dong, M Butcher, F Ahfat, S K Hindi, S Kotta.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Disposable devices are increasingly becoming the preferred choice where possible in contact medical equipment. AIM: To evaluate the accuracy of the disposable applanation tonometer head as a potential substitute to the standard Goldmann applanation head.
METHODS: The study was prospective. The intraocular pressure recordings in 80 eyes of 42 patients were compared using the disposable and standard Goldmann applanator heads. The Bland and Altman method of assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement was used in the analysis.
RESULTS: The difference in the readings between the two types of tonometer heads was highly variable (mean difference=0.78 mm Hg, range=-1 to 11 mm Hg). This was because of the distortions on the applanating surface of the disposable device. When the readings associated with the defective heads were excluded, very strong agreement was obtained (mean=0.07 mm Hg, range=-1 to 2 mm Hg).
CONCLUSION: Good agreement with standard Goldmann applanation is achieved with the disposable heads except where surface distortions induce significant errors. Careful inspection to ensure well-structured disposable units is imperative in disposable applanation tonometry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14762411     DOI: 10.1038/sj.eye.6700553

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


  3 in total

1.  Potential effects of systematic errors in intraocular pressure measurements on screening for ocular hypertension.

Authors:  M J Turner; S L Graham; A P Avolio; P Mitchell
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Reliability of tonosafe disposable tonometer prisms: clinical implications from the Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System Quality Assurance Study.

Authors:  V Thomas; M K Daly; T Cakiner-Egilmez; E Baker
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Disposable versus non-disposable tonometer prisms: a UK national survey.

Authors:  Kirti M Jasani; Christine Putri; Amy Pearl; Nayeem Sattar; Karl Mercieca; George Spaeth; Archana Bhan-Bhargava
Journal:  BMJ Open Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-03-09
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.