Literature DB >> 14760179

Audit on flexible sigmoidoscopy for rectal bleeding in a district general hospital: are we over-loading the resources?

J Mathew1, P Shankar, I M Aldean.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Patients with rectal bleeding are being over investigated because of the fear of missing colorectal cancers. This study aimed to identify the percentage of patients <45 years of age who undergo flexible sigmoidoscopy for rectal bleeding, and to assess and compare the incidence of colorectal cancers and polyps above and below this age.
METHODS: Patients who underwent flexible sigmoidoscopy for rectal bleeding between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2002 were reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups: group 1 consisted of patients aged >or=45 years and group 2 patients <45 years. The histopathology of biopsy specimens taken was also studied.
RESULTS: Altogether 18.9% of the patients who had flexible sigmoidoscopy for rectal bleeding were <45 years. The incidence of colorectal cancers in group 1 was 3.5%; all these cases were confirmed on histopathology. Only one patient in group 2 was diagnosed with colorectal cancer on flexible sigmoidoscopy, but the histopathology disproved it. The incidence of polyps was 16.6% in group 1 and 7.9% in group 2. Following histopathology, the incidence of adenomatous polyps was 6.8% in group 1 and 2.1% in group 2. There was a significant difference between the two groups, with a p value of <0.0001.
CONCLUSION: The incidence of colorectal cancers and adenomatous polyps in patients aged <45 years with rectal bleeding is very low. A flexible sigmoidoscopy costs approximately pound 330. If new guidelines are implemented considering the age of the patient, considerable cost savings could be made, and the available resources could be appropriately used in groups with high incidences of colorectal cancers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14760179      PMCID: PMC1757955          DOI: 10.1136/pmj.2003.008284

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Postgrad Med J        ISSN: 0032-5473            Impact factor:   2.401


  8 in total

1.  Does isolated rectal bleeding suggest colorectal cancer?

Authors:  M Douek; M Wickramasinghe; M A Clifton
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-07-31       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Comparison of the color of fecal blood with the anatomical location of gastrointestinal bleeding lesions: potential misdiagnosis using only flexible sigmoidoscopy for bright red blood per rectum.

Authors:  K D Fine; A C Nelson; R T Ellington; A Mossburg
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Defining the role of fiberoptic sigmoidoscopy in the investigation of patients presenting with bright red rectal bleeding.

Authors:  G M Van Rosendaal; L R Sutherland; M J Verhoef; R J Bailey; P K Blustein; E A Lalor; A B Thomson; J B Meddings
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  History of visible rectal bleeding in a primary care population. Initial assessment and 10-year follow-up.

Authors:  M Helfand; K I Marton; M J Zimmer-Gembeck; H C Sox
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-01-01       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Analysis of the colonoscopic findings in patients with rectal bleeding according to the pattern of their presenting symptoms.

Authors:  J M Church
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  How do general practitioners manage rectal bleeding?

Authors:  M J Sladden; A N Thomson
Journal:  Aust Fam Physician       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb

7.  Self-reported rectal bleeding in a United States community: prevalence, risk factors, and health care seeking.

Authors:  N J Talley; M Jones
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Predictive value of signs and symptoms for colorectal cancer in patients with rectal bleeding in general practice.

Authors:  G H Fijten; R Starmans; J W Muris; H J Schouten; G H Blijham; J A Knottnerus
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.267

  8 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Gastroenterology services in the UK. The burden of disease, and the organisation and delivery of services for gastrointestinal and liver disorders: a review of the evidence.

Authors:  J G Williams; S E Roberts; M F Ali; W Y Cheung; D R Cohen; G Demery; A Edwards; M Greer; M D Hellier; H A Hutchings; B Ip; M F Longo; I T Russell; H A Snooks; J C Williams
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Correlation between preoperative endoscopic and intraoperative findings in localizing colorectal lesions.

Authors:  Martine Adam Louis; Kalyana Nandipati; Rakel Astorga; Anupa Mandava; Carl-P Rousseau; Neil Mandava
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.352

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.