Literature DB >> 8536830

Predictive value of signs and symptoms for colorectal cancer in patients with rectal bleeding in general practice.

G H Fijten1, R Starmans, J W Muris, H J Schouten, G H Blijham, J A Knottnerus.   

Abstract

The aim of the study is to determine the diagnostic value of (combinations of) signs, symptoms and simple laboratory test results for colorectal cancer in patients with rectal bleeding presenting in general practice. Initial complaints and findings were compared with the final diagnoses based on clinical follow-up after at least 1 year. Patients studied were those presenting overt rectal bleeding to the general practitioner (83 GPs in the South of the Netherlands). Outcome measures are sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, odds ratios and a prediction model derived from multiple logistic regression analysis. Age, change in bowel habit and blood mixed with or on stool show a statistically significant independent value in the discrimination between patients with a low and those with a high probability of colorectal cancer. Many other variables did not show predictive value. The prediction model has a sensitivitiy of 100% and a specificity of 90%. Although the number of patients with colorectal cancer is small (n = 9) it was possible to identify three characteristics which can be helpful in the prediction of presence or absence of colorectal cancer in general practice. Application of the model presented might prevent 90% of 'unnecessary' invasive diagnostic procedures for patients with rectal bleeding who do not have colorectal cancer (true negative). Testing the performance of the model in other general practice populations is recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8536830     DOI: 10.1093/fampra/12.3.279

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Pract        ISSN: 0263-2136            Impact factor:   2.267


  37 in total

1.  Rectal bleeding and colorectal cancer. Inclusion criteria of study need clarification.

Authors:  T Fahey; A Montgomery; K Schroeder
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-03-10

2.  A time for change and a time for vision.

Authors:  A F Wright
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  The early detection of colorectal cancer in primary care.

Authors:  R Jones; T Kennedy
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 4.  Diagnosis and general practice.

Authors:  N Summerton
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  New arrangements for NHS R&D funding: implications for primary care research.

Authors:  Roger Jones; Yvonne Carter; Sean Hilton
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Cancer recognition and primary care.

Authors:  Nicholas Summerton
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  Is the two week rule for cancer referrals working?

Authors:  R Jones; G Rubin; P Hungin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-06-30

8.  Management of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  A Melville; T A Sheldon; R Gray; A Sowden
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1998-06

9.  GPs can separate oncological wheat from chaff.

Authors:  William T Hamilton; Alison P Round; Deborah Sharp; Tim Peters
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-02-15

Review 10.  Hematochezia in the young patient: a review of health-seeking behavior, physician attitudes, and controversies in management.

Authors:  Rashid Khan; David Hyman
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 3.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.