Literature DB >> 14759636

Treatment of progressive forms of multiple sclerosis by cyclophosphamide: a cohort study of 490 patients.

H Zephir1, J de Seze, A Duhamel, M Debouverie, P Hautecoeur, C Lebrun, I Malikova, J Pelletier, O Sénéchal, P Vermersch.   

Abstract

There are no generally effective disease-modifying drugs for progressive forms of multiple sclerosis (MS). Some MS centres use cyclophosphamide (CYC) in secondary progressive (SP) forms of MS, especially after interferon beta-1b (INFbeta-1b) treatment failure. Moreover, there are currently no approved drugs for primary progressive (PP) MS. Using the collected data of patients with progressive MS, we studied clinical patterns that predicted a good response to CYC treatment. Secondly, we compared the therapeutic response of SPMS and PPMS patients to the treatment. Data from 490 MS patients were collected. All patients presented an SP (n = 362) or PP (n = 128) form of the disease and 476 had been treated for at least one year with a monthly pulse of CYC associated with methylprednisolone (MP). CYC treatment was justified because of at least a 1-point worsening on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) during the previous year. The EDSS score was assessed at baseline and after 6 months (M6) and 12 months (M12) of treatment. After 12 months of CYC treatment, 78.6% of SPMS and 73.5% of PPMS patients had stabilised or had an improved EDSS score. Response to CYC was not significantly different in the two progressive forms of MS. Twenty-two patients presented noticeable drug side effects, one of whom withdrew from the treatment due to intolerance. Patients with an improved EDSS at M12 had a shorter mean progressive time course (5.1 years) than patients who stabilised or worsened (7.1 years) (p = 0.02). We also observed that poor responders at M6 were also poor responders at M12 (p < 0.001). This large cohort study showed that CYC treatment was well tolerated and suggested that a better response occurred in cases with a short progressive time course. We did not find any difference in treatment response between the two progressive forms of MS. To date, no treatment is approved for PPMS and we therefore propose a trial to test the use of CYC treatment early in the course of the disease in PPMS patients with disability progression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14759636     DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2003.11.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Sci        ISSN: 0022-510X            Impact factor:   3.181


  17 in total

1.  Escalating immunotherapy of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Peter Rieckmann; Anthony Traboulsee; Virginia Devonshire; Joel Oger
Journal:  Ther Adv Neurol Disord       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 6.570

2.  Cyclophosphamide in multiple sclerosis: scientific rationale, history and novel treatment paradigms.

Authors:  Amer Awad; Olaf Stüve
Journal:  Ther Adv Neurol Disord       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 6.570

Review 3.  Cyclophosphamide for multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  L La Mantia; C Milanese; N Mascoli; R D'Amico; B Weinstock-Guttman
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-01-24

4.  Current role of chemotherapy and bone marrow transplantation in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Nuria Sola-Valls; María Sepúlveda; Yolanda Blanco; Albert Saiz
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 5.  Role of immunosuppressive therapy for the treatment of multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  James M Stankiewicz; Hadar Kolb; Arnon Karni; Howard L Weiner
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 7.620

6.  [The effect of combined mitoxantrone and methylprednisolone therapy in primary and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. An applied study in 65 patients].

Authors:  V C Zingler; M Strupp; K Jahn; A Gross; R Hohlfeld; T Brandt
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 7.  Primary progressive multiple sclerosis : current and future treatment options.

Authors:  Siobhan M Leary; Alan J Thompson
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.749

8.  Mitoxantrone versus cyclophosphamide in secondary-progressive multiple sclerosis: a comparative study.

Authors:  Paola Perini; Massimiliano Calabrese; Michela Tiberio; Federica Ranzato; Leontino Battistin; Paolo Gallo
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2006-04-11       Impact factor: 4.849

9.  Management of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis: prophylactic treatment-past, present, and future aspects.

Authors:  Paulus S Rommer; Olaf Stüve
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.598

10.  The development of primary central nervous system B-cell lymphoma in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Mark K Lyons; Orland K Boucher; Barry D Birch; Naresh P Patel
Journal:  Neurohospitalist       Date:  2011-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.