Literature DB >> 14759574

Further prospective findings with compound action potentials from Nucleus 24 cochlear implants.

Marek Polak1, Annelle V Hodges, Jack E King, Thomas J Balkany.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to gain greater understanding of compound action potential (CAP) specific characteristics including: slope of the growth function, P1-N1 amplitude, threshold and latencies of P1 and N1 measured in cochlear implant users. Experienced adult subjects underwent behavioral threshold (T) measurement and electrically elicited stapedial reflex (eSR) recording, followed by CAP measurements on six selected electrodes. Based on the electrically elicited stapedial reflex threshold (eSRT), maximum stimulation level for each measured electrode was set. Relationships among the three thresholds of the above measures and maximum CAP P1-N1 amplitude and slope of the growth function were statistically evaluated for each measured electrode. Threshold of the CAP response showed relationships of similar strength with eSRT and T (r=0.69 and 0.61, respectively). For both slope of the growth function and CAP P1-N1 amplitude, a statistically significant relationship with cochlear place was found. Both specific characteristics of CAP measurement for the most apical electrodes were roughly double those for the most basal electrode (alpha=0.05). This may be partially explained by cochlear anatomy and is consistent with prior mammalian and human studies showing increasing density and survival of spiral ganglion cells in the regions corresponding to intracochlear electrode placement from basal to apical electrodes (90-360 degrees ).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14759574     DOI: 10.1016/S0378-5955(03)00309-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  8 in total

1.  Across-site patterns of electrically evoked compound action potential amplitude-growth functions in multichannel cochlear implant recipients and the effects of the interphase gap.

Authors:  Kara C Schvartz-Leyzac; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Technical devices for hearing-impaired individuals: cochlear implants and brain stem implants - developments of the last decade.

Authors:  Joachim Müller
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2005-09-28

Review 3.  The Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential: From Laboratory to Clinic.

Authors:  Shuman He; Holly F B Teagle; Craig A Buchman
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  Dendritic Degeneration of Human Auditory Nerve Fibers and Its Impact on the Spiking Pattern Under Regular Conditions and During Cochlear Implant Stimulation.

Authors:  Amirreza Heshmat; Sogand Sajedi; Lejo Johnson Chacko; Natalie Fischer; Anneliese Schrott-Fischer; Frank Rattay
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  Site of cochlear stimulation and its effect on electrically evoked compound action potentials using the MED-EL standard electrode array.

Authors:  Stefan Brill; Joachim Müller; Rudolf Hagen; Alexander Möltner; Steffi-Johanna Brockmeier; Thomas Stark; Silke Helbig; Jan Maurer; Thomas Zahnert; Clemens Zierhofer; Peter Nopp; Ilona Anderson; Stefan Strahl
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 2.819

6.  The Sensitivity of the Electrically Stimulated Auditory Nerve to Amplitude Modulation Cues Declines With Advanced Age.

Authors:  William J Riggs; Chloe Vaughan; Jeffrey Skidmore; Sara Conroy; Angela Pellittieri; Brittney L Carter; Curtis J Stegman; Shuman He
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.562

7.  The Effect of Pulse Polarity on Neural Response of the Electrically Stimulated Cochlear Nerve in Children With Cochlear Nerve Deficiency and Children With Normal-Sized Cochlear Nerves.

Authors:  Lei Xu; Jeffrey Skidmore; Jianfen Luo; Xiuhua Chao; Ruijie Wang; Haibo Wang; Shuman He
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.562

8.  In Vivo Basilar Membrane Time Delays in Humans.

Authors:  Marek Polak; Artur Lorens; Adam Walkowiak; Mariusz Furmanek; Piotr Henryk Skarzynski; Henryk Skarzynski
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-03-17
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.