Literature DB >> 14759016

Nonoccupational noise: exposures associated with routine activities.

Richard Neitzel1, Noah Seixas, John Olson, William Daniell, Bryan Goldman.   

Abstract

Efforts to characterize nonoccupational noise exposures have focused primarily on infrequent, episodic events. Few studies have assessed noise levels resulting from routine daily activities. In the current study, 112 construction workers wore datalogging noise dosimeters and simultaneously completed activity logs during two phases of data collection. The 81 subjects monitored in phase 1 received logs listing numerous preselected occupational and nonoccupational activities, while the 31 subjects monitored in phase 2 used free-field logs and reported nonoccupational activities in greater detail. Nearly all of the 221,439 1-min intervals of nonoccupational L(eq) level and activity reporting were below 70 dBA; only a small percentage exceeded 80 dBA. The primary contributor to nonoccupational noise exposure was traveling in a car or bus, while time at home contributed the least. One hundred seventy 24-h L(eq) levels were computed from the 1-min noise level data. The percentage of phase 2 workday L(eq(24)) levels which exceeded 80 dBA was higher than that of the nonworkday levels. The mean L(eq(24)) level of phase 2 workdays was higher than that of nonworkdays, and the difference was statistically significant. Routine nonoccupational noise exposures contributed much less to total noise dose than occupational exposures in the subjects evaluated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14759016     DOI: 10.1121/1.1615569

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  8 in total

1.  Predictors of hearing threshold levels and distortion product otoacoustic emissions among noise exposed young adults.

Authors:  N S Seixas; S G Kujawa; S Norton; L Sheppard; R Neitzel; A Slee
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Evaluation and comparison of three exposure assessment techniques.

Authors:  R L Neitzel; W E Daniell; L Sheppard; H W Davies; N S Seixas
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.155

3.  Exposures to transit and other sources of noise among New York City residents.

Authors:  Richard L Neitzel; Robyn R M Gershon; Tara P McAlexander; Lori A Magda; Julie M Pearson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Auditory function in normal-hearing, noise-exposed human ears.

Authors:  Greta C Stamper; Tiffany A Johnson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Noise Exposure Questionnaire: A Tool for Quantifying Annual Noise Exposure.

Authors:  Tiffany A Johnson; Susan Cooper; Greta C Stamper; Mark Chertoff
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.664

6.  Noise levels associated with New York City's mass transit systems.

Authors:  Richard Neitzel; Robyn R M Gershon; Marina Zeltser; Allison Canton; Muhammad Akram
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Do hearing protectors protect hearing?

Authors:  Matthew R Groenewold; Elizabeth A Masterson; Christa L Themann; Rickie R Davis
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 2.214

8.  Heart Rate, Stress, and Occupational Noise Exposure among Electronic Waste Recycling Workers.

Authors:  Katrina N Burns; Kan Sun; Julius N Fobil; Richard L Neitzel
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.