Literature DB >> 14758211

Importance of lateral row perforator vessels in deep inferior epigastric perforator flap harvesting.

Alexandre Mendonça Munhoz1, Luis Henrique Ishida, Gustavo Pinós Sturtz, Marcelo Sacramento Cunha, Eduardo Montag, Fábio Lopes Saito, Rolf Gemperli, Marcus Castro Ferreira.   

Abstract

Free flaps based on perforator vessels, and in particular the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap, are currently being applied in abdominal reconstruction. However, one of the main disadvantages is the operative complexity. Through anatomical study and clinical experience with the DIEP flap in breast reconstruction, the intramuscular path of the perforator vessels was comparatively studied, to establish the main anatomical parameters that favor procedure planning. Thirty DIEP flaps from 15 fresh cadavers were used. The number, location, and intramuscular course of the perforator vessels were determined. In addition, an initial clinical study was performed in 31 patients using 35 DIEP flaps in breast reconstruction. The number, location, and the intramuscular course of the perforators were assessed. In the cadaver study, 191 perforator vessels were detected (6.4 vessels per flap). Thirty-four percent were located in the lateral row, and the rectilinear course was observed in 79.2 percent of these vessels. In the medial row, only 18.2 percent of the perforator vessels presented this configuration (p = 0.001). Thirty-one patients underwent DIEP flap breast reconstruction, with 26 immediate and four bilateral reconstructions. In 22 of 35 flaps (62.9 percent), two perforators were used. In 25 flaps (71.4 percent), the lateral row perforators with a rectilinear course were observed. Mean operative time was 7 hours and 37 minutes. Two total flap losses and two partial necroses were observed. The majority of the lateral row perforators presented a rectilinear intramuscular course, which was shorter than that of the medial row perforators. This anatomical characteristic favors dissection with reduced operative time and vascular lesion morbidity, resulting in an important anatomical parameter for DIEP flap harvesting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14758211     DOI: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000100812.37842.A8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  3 in total

Review 1.  Immediate nipple-areola-sparing mastectomy reconstruction: An update on oncological and reconstruction techniques.

Authors:  Alexandre Mendonça Munhoz; Eduardo Montag; José Roberto Filassi; Rolf Gemperli
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-10

2.  Lipoabdominoplasty with Progressive Traction Sutures.

Authors:  Javier Vera Cucchiaro; Horacio Lostia; Patricia Velazquez; Elizabeth Liska
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2017-06-29

3.  Myth-Busting the DIEP Flap and an Introduction to the Abdominal Perforator Exchange (APEX) Breast Reconstruction Technique: A Single-Surgeon Retrospective Review.

Authors:  Frank J DellaCroce; Hannah C DellaCroce; Craig A Blum; Scott K Sullivan; Christopher G Trahan; M Whitten Wise; Irena G Brates
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 4.730

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.