Literature DB >> 14757958

Mechanical properties of four methylmethacrylate-based resins for provisional fixed restorations.

E P Hernandez1, Y Oshida, J A Platt, C J Andres, M T Barco, D T Brown.   

Abstract

The use of a provisional restoration is an important phase in the treatment of the dental prosthetic patient. A good provisional restoration should satisfy the following requirements: pulpal protection, positional stability, ease in cleaning, accurate margins, wear resistance, dimensional stability, and serve as a diagnostic aid in treatment assessment and esthetics. There is a tendency for discoloration, occlusal wear, and fracture that eventually leads to unnecessary repair. Heat-processed and reinforced methacrylate-based resins have been used to improve the mechanical and physical properties of provisional restorations. Among various improvements, the interpenetrating network crosslinked PMMA (IPN) has been shown to have superior mechanical properties if manufactured through a dough compression molding process at 130 degrees C. However, there have been no published data that relate with the use of this material for fixed provisional restorations. The objective of this study was to compare four methyl methacrylate-based resins for provisional crowns and bridges with varying processing cycles, including JET [self-cure], ACRALON [heat-cured], titanium dioxide filled PMMA [heat-cured], and IPN [heat-cured denture tooth resin]. Properties studied included transverse strength, toughness, rigidity, and hardness. From the results of this study the following conclusions can be made: the IPN group may have had a lower degree of conversion as demonstrated by decreased strength, toughness, and hardness data as compared with Acralon. Increasing the polymerization cycle of unmodified Acralon resin causes a significant increase in strength.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14757958

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Mater Eng        ISSN: 0959-2989            Impact factor:   1.300


  7 in total

1.  The Boston Keratoprosthesis: comparing corneal epithelial cell compatibility with titanium and PMMA.

Authors:  Jared D Ament; Sandra J Spurr-Michaud; Claes H Dohlman; Ilene K Gipson
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.651

2.  Various Surface Treatments to Implant Provisional Restorations and Their Effect on Epithelial Cell Adhesion: A Comparative In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Darya Luchinskaya; Rong Du; David M Owens; Dennis Tarnow; Nurit Bittner
Journal:  Implant Dent       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.454

3.  Elastic, viscoelastic and viscoplastic contributions to compliance during deformation under stress in prosthodontic temporization materials.

Authors:  Tritala K Vaidyanathan; Jayalakshmi Vaidyanathan; David Arghavani
Journal:  Acta Biomater Odontol Scand       Date:  2016-08-24

4.  Shear bond strength of provisional repair materials bonded to 3D printed resin.

Authors:  Rami Albahri; Hyung-In Yoon; Jason D Lee; Sena Yoon; Sang J Lee
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2020-05-30       Impact factor: 2.080

5.  Evaluation of hardness and wear resistance of interim restorative materials.

Authors:  Omid Savabi; Farahnaz Nejatidanesh; Mohamad Hossein Fathi; Amir Arsalan Navabi; Ghazal Savabi
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2013-03

6.  Effect of Nanoclay on Thermal Conductivity and Flexural Strength of Polymethyl Methacrylate Acrylic Resin.

Authors:  Tahereh Ghaffari; Ali Barzegar; Fahimeh Hamedi Rad; Elnaz Moslehifard
Journal:  J Dent (Shiraz)       Date:  2016-06

7.  Tensile strength and impact strength of color modified acrylic resin reinforced with titanium dioxide nanoparticles.

Authors:  Loghman Ghahremani; Saeed Shirkavand; Faezeh Akbari; Niloofar Sabzikari
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2017-05-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.