Literature DB >> 14755114

Differences between lovastatin and simvastatin hydrolysis in healthy male and female volunteers:gut hydrolysis of lovastatin is twice that of simvastatin.

Tom B Vree1, Erik Dammers, Ivan Ulc, Stefan Horkovics-Kovats, Miroslav Ryska, Ijsbrand Merkx.   

Abstract

The aim of this pharmacokinetic evaluation was to show the effect of the extra methyl group in simvastatin on esterase hydrolysis between lovastatin and simvastatin in male and female volunteers. This study was based on the plasma concentration-time curves and the pharmacokinetics of lovastatin and simvastatin with its respective active metabolite statin-beta-hydroxy acid obtained from two different bioequivalence studies, each with 18 females and 18 males. Results were: The group of female volunteers showed a higher yield of the active metabolite beta-hydroxy acid than the group of males (p < 0.002) for both lovastatin and simvastatin. This difference was not related to the body weight of both groups. In the male/female groups, subject-dependent yield of active metabolite beta-hydroxy acid was demonstrated, which was independent of the formulation. The variation in plasma/liver hydrolysis resulted in a fan-shaped distribution of data points when the AUCt lovastatin was plotted vs. that of the beta-hydroxy acid metabolite. In the fan of data points, subgroups could be distinguished, each showing a different regression line and with a different Y-intercept (AUCtbeta-hydroxy acid). Lovastatin hydrolysis was higher than simvastatin hydrolysis. It was possible to discriminate between hydrolysis of both lovastatin and simvastatin by plasma/liver or tissue esterase activity. The three subgroups of subjects (males/females) showing different but high yield of statin beta-hydroxy acid can be explained by variable hydrolysis of plasma and hepatic microsomal and cytosolic carboxyesterase activity. This study showed clearly that despite the subject-dependent hydrolysis of lovastatin/simvastatin to the active metabolite, males tend to hydrolyse less than females. The extra methyl group in simvastatin results in less hydrolysis due to steric hindrance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14755114      PMCID: PMC5974895          DOI: 10.1100/tsw.2003.121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal        ISSN: 1537-744X


  8 in total

Review 1.  Which sources of flavonoids: complex diets or dietary supplements?

Authors:  Sarah Egert; Gerald Rimbach
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2011-01-10       Impact factor: 8.701

2.  Sex differences in the effectiveness of statins after myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Igor Karp; Shun-Fu Chen; Louise Pilote
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-01-30       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Long-term delayed emergence after remimazolam-based general anesthesia: a case report.

Authors:  Tsubasa Takemori; Yoshimasa Oyama; Takenori Makino; Seigo Hidaka; Takaaki Kitano
Journal:  JA Clin Rep       Date:  2022-10-19

Review 4.  The role of human carboxylesterases in drug metabolism: have we overlooked their importance?

Authors:  S Casey Laizure; Vanessa Herring; Zheyi Hu; Kevin Witbrodt; Robert B Parker
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.705

5.  Association of Oseltamivir Activation with Gender and Carboxylesterase 1 Genetic Polymorphisms.

Authors:  Jian Shi; Xinwen Wang; Rachel F Eyler; Yan Liang; Li Liu; Bruce A Mueller; Hao-Jie Zhu
Journal:  Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 4.080

6.  NCI60 cancer cell line panel data and RNAi analysis help identify EAF2 as a modulator of simvastatin and lovastatin response in HCT-116 cells.

Authors:  Sevtap Savas; David O Azorsa; Hamdi Jarjanazi; Irada Ibrahim-Zada; Irma M Gonzales; Shilpi Arora; Meredith C Henderson; Yun Hee Choi; Laurent Briollais; Hilmi Ozcelik; Sukru Tuzmen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-04       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Preliminary Investigation on Simvastatin-Loaded Polymeric Micelles in View of the Treatment of the Back of the Eye.

Authors:  Silvia Pescina; Fabio Sonvico; Adryana Clementino; Cristina Padula; Patrizia Santi; Sara Nicoli
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 6.321

8.  Are There Sex-Specific Differences in Response to Adjunctive Host-Directed Therapies for Tuberculosis?

Authors:  Noton K Dutta; Bianca E Schneider
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 7.561

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.