Literature DB >> 14753636

Implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients: quality of life in recipients with and without ICD shock delivery: a prospective study.

H C M Kamphuis1, J R J de Leeuw, R Derksen, R N W Hauer, J A M Winnubst.   

Abstract

AIMS: The experiences of patients who received shocks from their implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) and how these events affect their overall adjustment are poorly understood. Our goal was to evaluate quality of life and psychological well-being, and the prevalence of, and changes in, depression and anxiety of patients who did or did not experience defibrillatory shocks in the first 12 months after ICD implantation. In total 167 patients were monitored after discharge. Four self-administered questionnaires were used. The first assessment took place before ICD implantation, the remaining three at 1, 6 and 12 months after discharge.
RESULTS: We classified patients into three shock groups and one no shock group. A small group of ICD recipients (26%) received ICD shock delivery, usually during the last 6 months of the study. Borderline significant differences were found within the groups over time regarding physical role limitations (P < 0.051). Those who experienced shocks throughout the year (group 1) felt more limited in their daily activities due to physical or mental problems. All groups health (P < 0.001). Overall quality of life did not change significantly after 6 months. Anxiety and depression did not change significantly over time. In total 22-66% of patients reported clinically significant depressive symptoms throughout the first year, and 31-83% clinically significant symptoms of anxiety. ICD recipients who had experienced a shock were significantly more anxious one-year postdischarge than those who had not received a shock.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall quality of life and psychological well-being did not change in ICD recipients, irrespective of whether they experienced defibrillatory shocks. The high prevalence of depression and anxiety can be interpreted as a response to the perceived physical and mental problems regarding daily activities. Our data indicate that patients who have experienced an ICD shock do not adapt well to living with an ICD, they are more anxious than ICD recipients who received no shocks. However, the anticipation of having another shock after experiencing one is less stressful than that of the first shock. We conclude that the lasting psychological distress will not dissipate spontaneously or naturally and that psychosocial interventions may be warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14753636     DOI: 10.1016/s1099-5129(03)00078-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Europace        ISSN: 1099-5129            Impact factor:   5.214


  51 in total

1.  Implantable cardioverter defibrillator: charge saver, not syncope saver!

Authors:  Diego Chemello; Anandaraja Subramanian; Sheila Watkins; Krishnakumar Nair; Kumaraswamy Nanthakumar
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 5.223

2.  Recollection of pain due to inappropriate versus appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks.

Authors:  Gregory M Marcus; Derrick W Chan; Rita F Redberg
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 1.976

3.  Use and Abuse of Internal Cardioverter Defibrillators for Primary Prevention.

Authors:  Joshua R Silverstein; Demosthenes G Katritsis; Mark E Josephson
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2012-09

Review 4.  Screening and Management of Depression in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.

Authors:  Manish K Jha; Arman Qamar; Muthiah Vaduganathan; Dennis S Charney; James W Murrough
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 5.  A Questionable Indication For ICD Extraction After Successful VT Ablation.

Authors:  Luca Segreti; Andrea Di Cori; Giulio Zucchelli; Ezio Soldati; Giovanni Coluccia; Stefano Viani; Luca Paperini; Maria Grazia Bongiorni
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2015-04-30

6.  Chronaxie of defibrillation: a pathway toward further optimization of defibrillation waveform?

Authors:  Igor R Efimov
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2008-10-14

7.  Ventricular tachycardia inducibility after radiofrequency ablation affects the outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: The role of left ventricular function.

Authors:  Andrea Colella; Marzia Giaccardi; Raffaele Molino Lova; Carmine Liccardi; Gian Franco Gensini
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2009-01-16       Impact factor: 1.900

8.  Noninvasive epicardial and endocardial electrocardiographic imaging of scar-related ventricular tachycardia.

Authors:  Linwei Wang; Omar A Gharbia; B Milan Horáček; John L Sapp
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 1.438

9.  Prophylactic catheter ablation for the prevention of defibrillator therapy.

Authors:  Vivek Y Reddy; Matthew R Reynolds; Petr Neuzil; Allison W Richardson; Milos Taborsky; Krit Jongnarangsin; Stepan Kralovec; Lucie Sediva; Jeremy N Ruskin; Mark E Josephson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-12-27       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 10.  Methodological limitations of psychosocial interventions in patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) A systematic review.

Authors:  Elena Salmoirago-Blotcher; Ira S Ockene
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 2.298

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.