Literature DB >> 14751476

Radiograph use in low back pain: a United States Emergency Department database analysis.

David M Isaacs1, Jacqueline Marinac, Chao Sun.   

Abstract

We identified factors associated with radiograph evaluation for patients who presented to the Emergency Department (ED) with uncomplicated low back pain (LBP). Using 1998-2000 ED data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, a multivariate analysis was performed to assess utilization of radiographs for LBP. Based upon published guidelines, of the over 3 million patients who met our criteria of uncomplicated LBP, 17.8% received an unnecessary radiograph. Patients who arrive via ambulance with moderate pain, who need to be seen within 15 min, and who have 3 or more screening tests ordered are 100% likely to also get a radiograph. There is an increased probability of receiving a radiograph for those patients 40-70 years old, being seen at a metropolitan hospital, having private insurance, and being treated by a resident in training. Multiple factors are associated with the overuse of radiographs for patients presenting with uncomplicated LBP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14751476     DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2003.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0736-4679            Impact factor:   1.484


  10 in total

1.  Gimme that old time religion: the influence of the healthcare belief system of chiropractic's early leaders on the development of x-ray imaging in the profession.

Authors:  Kenneth John Young
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2014-10-28

Review 2.  Race/Ethnicity and overuse of care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nancy R Kressin; Peter W Groeneveld
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.911

3.  The role of MRI in musculoskeletal practice: a clinical perspective.

Authors:  Gail Dean Deyle
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2011-08

4.  Can you diagnose for vertebral fracture correctly by plain X-ray?

Authors:  Z Ito; A Harada; Y Matsui; M Takemura; N Wakao; T Suzuki; T Nihashi; S Kawatsu; H Shimokata; N Ishiguro
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-08-18       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Interventions for improving the appropriate use of imaging in people with musculoskeletal conditions.

Authors:  Simon D French; Sally Green; Rachelle Buchbinder; Hayley Barnes
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-01-20

6.  Identifying factors likely to influence compliance with diagnostic imaging guideline recommendations for spine disorders among chiropractors in North America: a focus group study using the Theoretical Domains Framework.

Authors:  André E Bussières; Andrea M Patey; Jill J Francis; Anne E Sales; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Melissa Brouwers; Gaston Godin; Jan Hux; Marie Johnston; Louise Lemyre; Marie-Pascale Pomey; Anne Sales; Merrick Zwarenstein
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 7.327

7.  Diagnostic imaging for spinal disorders in the elderly: a narrative review.

Authors:  John Am Taylor; André Bussières
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2012-05-24

8.  Another Pill, Another Test, and Another Procedure: One Resident's Reflection on Healthcare Cost Containment.

Authors:  Jason Chertoff
Journal:  Glob Adv Health Med       Date:  2015-03

9.  Clinician, patient and general public beliefs about diagnostic imaging for low back pain: protocol for a qualitative evidence synthesis.

Authors:  Adrian C Traeger; Benjamin J Reed; Denise A O'Connor; Tammy C Hoffmann; Gustavo C Machado; Carissa Bonner; Chris G Maher; Rachelle Buchbinder
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-02-10       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Are Emergency Medicine Provider Characteristics Associated With Diagnostic Imaging for Low Back Pain?

Authors:  Jonathan Doucett; Jill Hayden; Kirk D Magee; Rachel Ogilvie
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-03-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.