Literature DB >> 14751341

Complications of abdominal urologic laparoscopy: longitudinal five-year analysis.

J Kellogg Parsons1, Ioannis Varkarakis, Koon H Rha, Thomas W Jarrett, Peter A Pinto, Louis R Kavoussi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To analyze complications of abdominal laparoscopic surgery of the urinary tract at a single institution during a 5-year period.
METHODS: From 1996 to 2000, we identified 894 abdominal laparoscopic procedures performed at a single institution: 600 nephrectomies (live donor, simple, radical, nephroureterectomy, and partial), 112 pyeloplasties, 61 renal biopsies, 35 retroperitoneal lymph node dissections, 31 renal cyst ablations, 18 adrenalectomies, and 37 other abdominal procedures. The charts were retrospectively reviewed for complications, which were classified as operative, postoperative, or medical. Complications were correlated with patient age and American Society of Anesthesiologists score. Statistical analysis was performed with Fisher's exact test and chi-square tests.
RESULTS: A total of 118 complications (13.2%) occurred. Two patients (0.2%) died. As a result of operative complications, the procedure of 13 patients (1.5%) was converted to an open one. As a result of postoperative complications, 13 (1.5%) underwent operative and 6 (0.7%) nonoperative intervention. The most common intraoperative complications were vascular (n = 23), adjacent organ (n = 10), and bowel (n = 9) injuries. The most common postoperative complications were neuromuscular pain (n = 12), hematoma (n = 11), urine leak (n = 7), and wound infection (n = 7). The differences in the annual complication rates for all procedures did not attain statistical significance (P = 0.5). Among all procedures, excluding live donor nephrectomy, complications of any kind correlated with a greater patient American Society of Anesthesiologists score (P = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Rather than decreasing, the overall incidence of laparoscopic complications did not change significantly during a 5-year period at our institution. The factors contributing to this observation likely included the progression of inexperienced individual surgeons through the learning curve, the introduction of new, more sophisticated laparoscopic procedures, and stable rates of patient comorbidity. This experience may represent the average complication rate for urologic laparoscopy at a large-volume, academic training center.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14751341     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2003.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  13 in total

1.  Evaluation of 2,590 urological laparoscopic surgeries undertaken by urological surgeons accredited by an endoscopic surgical skill qualification system in urological laparoscopy in Japan.

Authors:  Tomonori Habuchi; Toshiro Terachi; Hiromitsu Mimata; Yukihiro Kondo; Hiroomi Kanayama; Tomohiko Ichikawa; Kikuo Nutahara; Tsuneharu Miki; Yoshinari Ono; Shiro Baba; Seiji Naito; Tadashi Matsuda
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Laparoscopic renal surgery for benign disease.

Authors:  Joseph C Liao; Alberto Breda; Peter G Schulam
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  The (soon forgotten) art of open stone surgery: to train or not to train?

Authors:  Noor N P Buchholz; Andrew Hitchings; Stephanos Albanis
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 4.  Learning curve in human laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Udaya Kumar; Inderbir S Gill
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Analysis of complications from 600 retroperitoneoscopic procedures of the upper urinary tract during the last 10 years.

Authors:  Dimitri Liapis; Alexandre de la Taille; Guillaume Ploussard; Grégoire Robert; Laurence Bastien; Andras Hoznek; Dimitri Vordos; Claude Abbou; Laurent Salomon
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Hyperbaric oxygen therapy in a patient with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease with a perinephritic abscess.

Authors:  Jorge Vega; Helmuth Goecke; Francisco Manriquez; Carlos Escobar; Max Escobar; Christian Videla; Mario Santamarina; Carlos Echeverria; Francisco Javier Guarda
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 2.801

7.  Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy is associated with higher risk of adverse events compared to laparoscopic radical nephrectomy.

Authors:  Ravin Bastiampillai; Luke T Lavallée; Sonya Cnossen; Kelsey Witiuk; Ranjeeta Mallick; Dean Fergusson; David Schramm; Christopher Morash; Ilias Cagiannos; Rodney H Breau
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 8.  Gastrointestinal complications of laparoscopic/robot-assisted urologic surgery and a review of the literature.

Authors:  Mert Ali Karadag; Kursat Cecen; Aslan Demir; Murat Bagcioglu; Ramazan Kocaaslan; Teoman Cem Kadioglu
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2015-02-09

9.  Fewer complications after laparoscopic nephrectomy as compared to the open procedure with the modified Clavien classification system--a retrospective analysis from southern China.

Authors:  Hua Xu; Qiang Ding; Hao-wen Jiang
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 2.754

10.  Complications of 411 laparoscopic urological procedures: A single surgeon experience.

Authors:  Khalid Al-Otaibi
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.