Literature DB >> 14748903

Use of health-related quality of life in prescribing research. Part 2: methodological considerations for the assessment of health-related quality of life in clinical trials.

M J Calvert1, N Freemantle.   

Abstract

This article aims to address key methodological issues that should be considered when assessing health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in a clinical trial. These include justification for the selection of HRQoL as a primary or secondary outcome and choice of an appropriate instrument to assess HRQoL, which meets basic psychometric properties. In addition we consider ways to minimize bias within the trial through optimization of compliance and timing of assessments.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14748903     DOI: 10.1046/j.0269-4727.2003.00520.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pharm Ther        ISSN: 0269-4727            Impact factor:   2.512


  8 in total

1.  Scales to climb borderline personalities: when science goes nowhere.

Authors:  L Moja; G Virgili; A Liberati; G F Gensini; R Gusinu; A A Conti
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.397

2.  Experiences with the FACT-EGFRI-18 instrument in EGFRI-associated mucocutaneous adverse events.

Authors:  Christine B Boers-Doets; Hans Gelderblom; Mario E Lacouture; Joel B Epstein; Johan W R Nortier; Ad A Kaptein
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-02-17       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Systematic collection of patient reported outcome research data: A checklist for clinical research professionals.

Authors:  Leslie Wehrlen; Mike Krumlauf; Elizabeth Ness; Damiana Maloof; Margaret Bevans
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 2.226

Review 4.  Systematic review reveals limitations of studies evaluating health-related quality of life after potentially curative treatment for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Marc Jacobs; Rhiannon C Macefield; Jane M Blazeby; Ida J Korfage; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Hanneke C J M de Haes; Ellen M Smets; Mirjam A G Sprangers
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-10-20       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Inconsistencies in quality of life data collection in clinical trials: a potential source of bias? Interviews with research nurses and trialists.

Authors:  Derek Kyte; Jonathan Ives; Heather Draper; Thomas Keeley; Melanie Calvert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Patient-reported outcome (PRO) assessment in clinical trials: a systematic review of guidance for trial protocol writers.

Authors:  Melanie Calvert; Derek Kyte; Helen Duffy; Adrian Gheorghe; Rebecca Mercieca-Bebber; Jonathan Ives; Heather Draper; Michael Brundage; Jane Blazeby; Madeleine King
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Patient reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical trials: is 'in-trial' guidance lacking? a systematic review.

Authors:  Derek G Kyte; Heather Draper; Jonathan Ives; Clive Liles; Adrian Gheorghe; Melanie Calvert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Patient-reported outcomes in randomized clinical trials: development of ISOQOL reporting standards.

Authors:  Michael Brundage; Jane Blazeby; Dennis Revicki; Brenda Bass; Henrica de Vet; Helen Duffy; Fabio Efficace; Madeleine King; Cindy L K Lam; David Moher; Jane Scott; Jeff Sloan; Claire Snyder; Susan Yount; Melanie Calvert
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 4.147

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.