Literature DB >> 14748103

The reversed Delta shoulder prosthesis in reconstruction of the proximal humerus after tumour resection.

Lieven De Wilde1, Gwen Sys, Yann Julien, Edwin Van Ovost, Bart Poffyn, Pierre Trouilloud.   

Abstract

The authors present two series of six and seven patients respectively, with a tumour of the proximal humerus, who were treated at two different institutions with a Delta type inverted shoulder prosthesis (DePuy International Ltd) after a Malawer type Ia or Ib resection. The rationale of using an inverted shoulder prosthesis is the aim to improve the functional outcome in rotator cuff deficient shoulders. This type of prosthesis medializes and lowers the centre of rotation, lengthens the lever arm of the deltoid muscle and improves its function. At one institution the resected part of the humerus was re-implanted after extracorporeal irradiation. It was fixed intramedullarly by cementation of the humeral prosthetic component to facilitate restoration of humeral height. This graft allowed reinsertion of muscles (deltoid, pectoralis, biceps) thus improving power generation postoperatively. The largest glenosphere, size 42, was routinely used to reconstruct the glenoid; this theoretically improves the functional outcome (increased external rotation) and stability. At the other institution no graft augmentation was used except in one patient. The height of the humeral prosthetic component was assessed after resection of the tumour by measurement of the resected part. The prosthetic stem was fitted in the remaining part of the humeral diaphysis, in three cases by cementation and in three cases by press-fit (hydroxyapatite coating). Muscle balance was appreciated intra-operatively. Stability of the prosthesis was directly related to the level of resection. Both techniques resulted in a minimum active abduction of 60 degrees, reaching 90 degrees or more in most patients. When compared to other results in the literature, this is a major functional improvement. The mean adjusted postoperative Constant score was 72.5% (range: 30-90%), and the mean MSTS score was 75.8% (range 36.7-96.7%).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14748103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg        ISSN: 0001-6462            Impact factor:   0.500


  19 in total

1.  Hierarchy of stability factors in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Sergio Gutiérrez; Tony S Keller; Jonathan C Levy; William E Lee; Zong-Ping Luo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-02-10       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Reverse total shoulder replacement: intraoperative and early postoperative complications.

Authors:  Carl Wierks; Richard L Skolasky; Jong Hun Ji; Edward G McFarland
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-08-07       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Arm lengthening after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a review.

Authors:  Alexandre Lädermann; Tom Bradley Edwards; Gilles Walch
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-11-23       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Is the Clavicula Pro Humero Technique of Value for Reconstruction After Resection of the Proximal Humerus in Children?

Authors:  Dominique Barbier; Benoît De Billy; Philippe Gicquel; Sophie Bourelle; Pierre Journeau
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  [Modular tumor prostheses of the humerus].

Authors:  P T Funovics; M Dominkus
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 6.  The reverse shoulder prosthesis: A review of imaging features and complications.

Authors:  Edward G McFarland; Prakasit Sanguanjit; Atsushi Tasaki; Ekavit Keyurapan; Elliot K Fishman; Laura M Fayad
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Does reverse shoulder arthroplasty for tumors of the proximal humerus reduce impairment?

Authors:  Lieven De Wilde; Pascal Boileau; Hans Van der Bracht
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 8.  Bone tumors in adolescents and young adults.

Authors:  Stefan S Bielack; Dorothe Carrle; Jendrik Hardes; Andreas Schuck; Michael Paulussen
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2008-05-01

9.  Reverse geometry shoulder replacement for proximal humeral metastases.

Authors:  R A Kapur; P A McCann; P P Sarangi
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.891

10.  Hospital readmissions after surgical treatment of proximal humerus fractures: is arthroplasty safer than open reduction internal fixation?

Authors:  Alan L Zhang; William W Schairer; Brian T Feeley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.