Literature DB >> 14745863

Breast magnetic resonance image screening and ductal lavage in women at high genetic risk for breast carcinoma.

Anne-Renee Hartman1, Bruce L Daniel, Allison W Kurian, Meredith A Mills, Kent W Nowels, Frederick M Dirbas, Kerry E Kingham, Nicki M Chun, Robert J Herfkens, James M Ford, Sylvia K Plevritis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intensive screening is an alternative to prophylactic mastectomy in women at high risk for developing breast carcinoma. The current article reports preliminary results from a screening protocol using high-quality magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ductal lavage (DL), clinical breast examination, and mammography to identify early malignancy and high-risk lesions in women at increased genetic risk of breast carcinoma.
METHODS: Women with inherited BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations or women with a >10% risk of developing breast carcinoma at 10 years, as estimated by the Claus model, were eligible. Patients were accrued from September 2001 to May 2003. Enrolled patients underwent biannual clinical breast examinations and annual mammography, breast MRI, and DL.
RESULTS: Forty-one women underwent an initial screen. Fifteen of 41 enrolled women (36.6%) either had undergone previous bilateral oophorectomy and/or were on tamoxifen at the time of the initial screen. One patient who was a BRCA1 carrier had high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) that was screen detected by MRI but that was missed on mammography. High-risk lesions that were screen detected by MRI in three women included radial scars and atypical lobular hyperplasia. DL detected seven women with cellular atypia, including one woman who had a normal MRI and mammogram.
CONCLUSIONS: Breast MRI identified high-grade DCIS and high-risk lesions that were missed by mammography. DL detected cytologic atypia in a high-risk cohort. A larger screening trial is needed to determine which subgroups of high-risk women will benefit and whether the identification of malignant and high-risk lesions at an early stage will impact breast carcinoma incidence and mortality. Copyright 2004 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14745863     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.11926

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  17 in total

1.  Opinions of women with high inherited breast cancer risk about prophylactic mastectomy: an initial evaluation from a screening trial including magnetic resonance imaging and ductal lavage.

Authors:  Allison W Kurian; Anne-Renee Hartman; Meredith A Mills; James M Ford; Bruce L Daniel; Sylvia K Plevritis
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Performance of Dual-Energy Contrast-enhanced Digital Mammography for Screening Women at Increased Risk of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Janice S Sung; Lizza Lebron; Delia Keating; Donna D'Alessio; Christopher E Comstock; Carol H Lee; Malcolm C Pike; Miranda Ayhan; Chaya S Moskowitz; Elizabeth A Morris; Maxine S Jochelson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Risk-reduction surgery decisions in high-risk women seen for genetic counseling.

Authors:  Jessica A Ray; Lois J Loescher; Molly Brewer
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Cancer screening with digital mammography for women at average risk for breast cancer, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for women at high risk: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2010-03-01

5.  Breast Cancers Detected at Screening MR Imaging and Mammography in Patients at High Risk: Method of Detection Reflects Tumor Histopathologic Results.

Authors:  Janice S Sung; Sarah Stamler; Jennifer Brooks; Jennifer Kaplan; Tammy Huang; D David Dershaw; Carol H Lee; Elizabeth A Morris; Christopher E Comstock
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Validity of models for predicting BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations.

Authors:  Giovanni Parmigiani; Sining Chen; Edwin S Iversen; Tara M Friebel; Dianne M Finkelstein; Hoda Anton-Culver; Argyrios Ziogas; Barbara L Weber; Andrea Eisen; Kathleen E Malone; Janet R Daling; Li Hsu; Elaine A Ostrander; Leif E Peterson; Joellen M Schildkraut; Claudine Isaacs; Camille Corio; Leoni Leondaridis; Gail Tomlinson; Christopher I Amos; Louise C Strong; Donald A Berry; Jeffrey N Weitzel; Sharon Sand; Debra Dutson; Rich Kerber; Beth N Peshkin; David M Euhus
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  CDH1 truncating mutations in the E-cadherin gene: an indication for total gastrectomy to treat hereditary diffuse gastric cancer.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Norton; Christine M Ham; Jacques Van Dam; R Brooke Jeffrey; Teri A Longacre; David G Huntsman; Nicki Chun; Allison W Kurian; James M Ford
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Ductal lavage in women from BRCA1/2 families: is there a future for ductal lavage in women at increased genetic risk of breast cancer?

Authors:  Jennifer T Loud; Anne C M Thiébaut; Andrea D Abati; Armando C Filie; Kathryn Nichols; David Danforth; Ruthann Giusti; Sheila A Prindiville; Mark H Greene
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Tolerability of breast ductal lavage in women from families at high genetic risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Jennifer T Loud; Ellen Burke Beckjord; Kathryn Nichols; June Peters; Ruthann Giusti; Mark H Greene
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 2.809

10.  Comparison of Random Periareolar Fine Needle Aspirate versus Ductal Lavage for Risk Assessment and Prevention of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Abigail Hoffman; Rod Pellenberg; Catherine Ibarra Drendall; Victoria Seewaldt
Journal:  Curr Breast Cancer Rep       Date:  2012-06-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.