Literature DB >> 14745566

Improved comfort in lower limb lengthening with the intramedullary skeletal kinetic distractor. Principles and preliminary clinical experiences.

Stefan Hankemeier1, Hans-Christoph Pape, Thomas Gosling, Tobias Hufner, Martinus Richter, Christian Krettek.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Limb lengthening by external fixators is associated with many problems such as pain at the pin tracts, muscle transfixation, pin tract infections, reduced joint motion, and prolonged fixation time. The intramedullary skeletal kinetic distractor (ISKD) is a new internal, mechanically activated implant, which distracts by mild rotations of 3 degrees.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a prospective clinical study, four patients with an mean age of 29 years (18-36 years) underwent intramedullary lengthening via ISKD. The average lengthening of three femora and one tibia was 31 mm (26-40 mm).
RESULTS: All patients performed the rotations for the distraction themselves without any significant problems. One patient took mild analgesics during the first days of distraction, whereas three patients did not require any analgesics. The average patient discharge occurred 10 days (8-11 days) postoperatively with no complications during the hospital stay. The planned length of distraction was achieved in all patients with normal alignment and normal joint orientation. Full weight bearing was performed on average after 10 weeks (7-14 weeks). Consolidation was noted 80 days (51-111 days) postoperatively with an average consolidation index of 2.9 days/mm. No complications were observed during the follow-up period of 14 months. The Enneking score was 26.8 points, and according to the classification of Paley all patients had an excellent result.
CONCLUSIONS: From these preliminary results we conclude that the comfort of limb lengthening with the ISKD is increased by the elimination of fixator-associated complications and by the simple distraction mechanism, which is well tolerated by the patients. Further advantages of the ISKD are early full weight bearing and excellent limb function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14745566     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-003-0625-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  16 in total

Review 1.  [Principles of callus distraction].

Authors:  S Hankemeier; L Bastian; T Gosling; C Krettek
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 2.  [Surgical technique for callus distraction].

Authors:  S Hankemeier; H C Pape; M Jagodzinski; C Krettek
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Femoral lengthening with lengthening over a nail has fewer complications than intramedullary skeletal kinetic distraction.

Authors:  Shahab Mahboubian; Matthew Seah; Austin T Fragomen; S Robert Rozbruch
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  A new technique for removal of an incarcerated expandable femoral nail.

Authors:  Emmanouil Liodakis; Christian Krettek; Mohamed Kenawey; Stefan Hankemeier
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Tibial lengthening: extraarticular calcaneotibial screw to prevent ankle equinus.

Authors:  Mohan V Belthur; Dror Paley; Gaurav Jindal; Rolf D Burghardt; Stacy C Specht; John E Herzenberg
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-09-18       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Complications of the Intramedullary Skeletal Kinetic Distractor (ISKD) in distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Dong Hoon Lee; Keun Jung Ryu; Hae Ryong Song; Soo-Hong Han
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Insufficient bone regenerate after intramedullary femoral lengthening: risk factors and classification system.

Authors:  Mohamed Kenawey; Christian Krettek; Emmanouil Liodakis; Rupert Meller; Stefan Hankemeier
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  [Intramedullary motorized nail for equalization of posttraumatic leg length discrepancies].

Authors:  U Lenze; C C Hasler; A H Krieg
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.000

9.  [Progress of remote-control intramedullary lengthening nail and its clinical treatment concept].

Authors:  Fuhuan Chen; H Thaller Peter; Sihe Qin
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-12-15

10.  Leg lengthening with a motorized nail in adolescents : an alternative to external fixators?

Authors:  Andreas H Krieg; Bernhard M Speth; Bruce K Foster
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.