Literature DB >> 14744347

Limitations of noncontrast CT for measuring ureteral stones.

Scott Van Appledorn1, Adam J Ball, Vipul R Patel, Sandy Kim, Raymond J Leveillee.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Patients with renal colic are frequently evaluated in the emergency room with a helical noncontrast CT scan (NCCT) as the primary imaging modality. Treatment decisions are often based on the size of the ureteral stone(s). We wished to assess the accuracy of NCCT in estimating ureteral stone size compared with plain abdominal (KUB) films. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-eight patients were identified who had ureteral stones seen on NCCT and KUB films performed on the same day. The number of consecutive images on which a ureteral stone was visible on NCCT was multiplied by the reconstruction interval of 5 mm to create a size estimate, which was compared with the measurements of the same stone seen on the KUB film.
RESULTS: The NCCT overestimated stone size by approximately 30% to 50% compared with KUB.
CONCLUSION: Counting the number of consecutive NCCT images depicting a ureteral stone is not an accurate method of stone measurement when a reconstruction interval of 5 mm is used. Urologists should consider stone measurement techniques carefully and understand the limitations of imaging studies when evaluating patients with symptomatic ureteral stones.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14744347     DOI: 10.1089/089277903772036127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  7 in total

Review 1.  [Diagnostic imaging--the end of intravenous urography?].

Authors:  W L Strohmaier; R Bartunek
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Coronal reconstruction of unenhanced abdominal CT for correct ureteral stone size classification.

Authors:  Nadav Berkovitz; Natalia Simanovsky; Ran Katz; Shaden Salama; Nurith Hiller
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Computer-aided detection of renal calculi from noncontrast CT images using TV-flow and MSER features.

Authors:  Jianfei Liu; Shijun Wang; Evrim B Turkbey; Marius George Linguraru; Jianhua Yao; Ronald M Summers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  How effective is extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of ureteral stones with Dornier Lithotripter S EMSE 220F-XXP? A prospective and preliminary assessment.

Authors:  Maria Chiara Sighinolfi; Salvatore Micali; Stefano De Stefani; Giovanni Alberto Pini; Massimo Rivalta; Filippo Cianci; Giampaolo Bianchi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Residual fragments after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Kaan Ozdedeli; Mete Cek
Journal:  Balkan Med J       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 2.021

6.  Imaging in pediatric urolithiasis-what's the best choice?

Authors:  Walter Ludwig Strohmaier
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2015-01

7.  Characteristics of gout patients according to the laterality of nephrolithiasis: A cross-sectional study using helical computed tomography.

Authors:  Toru Shimizu; Hiroshi Hori; Masanori Umeyama; Kentaro Shimizu
Journal:  Int J Rheum Dis       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 2.454

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.