Literature DB >> 14743024

Correlation of interosseous membrane tears to the level of the fibular fracture.

Jason H Nielson1, Julian G Sallis, Hollis G Potter, David L Helfet, Dean G Lorich.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To correlate interosseous membrane (IOM) tears of the ankle to the height of fibular fractures in operative ankle fractures.
DESIGN: Prospective clinical trial.
SETTING: University Level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS: All patients admitted with a closed operative ankle fracture were included. Of 93 patients originally evaluated, 73 patients had adequate MRI for evaluation. INTERVENTION: Open reduction and internal fixation of each ankle fracture was performed after preoperative MRI evaluation of the IOM. Transsyndesmotic screw fixation was performed when evidence of syndesmotic instability was shown by intraoperative stress testing. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Radiographs were analyzed for fracture classification and prediction of ligamentous injuries about the ankle. MRI evaluated the IOM integrity, correlating it to the height of the fibular fracture.
RESULTS: Of the 73 ankle fractures with adequate MRI evaluation, 30 had identifiable complete IOM tears on MRI. Ten of the 30 IOM tears did not correlate with the level of the fractured fibula. Seven cases had IOM tears proximal to the fibular fracture as detected by MRI. Five of these cases were Weber B type fractures, and two were Weber C type fracture patterns. Conversely, three cases of Weber C type fractures had IOM tears that remained distal to the level of the fibular fracture.
CONCLUSIONS: The level of the fibular fracture does not correlate reliably with the integrity or extent of the interosseous membrane tears identified on MRI in operative ankle fractures. One cannot consistently estimate the integrity of the IOM and subsequent need for transsyndesmotic fixation based solely on the level of the fibular fracture. An intraoperative syndesmotic stress test is recommended to establish the presence or absence of syndesmotic instability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14743024     DOI: 10.1097/00005131-200402000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  7 in total

Review 1.  [Problems and controversies in the treatment of ankle fractures].

Authors:  S Rammelt; D Heim; L C Hofbauer; R Grass; H Zwipp
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Diagnosing syndesmotic instability in ankle fractures.

Authors:  Michel Pj van den Bekerom
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2011-07-18

3.  In Vivo Syndesmotic Overcompression After Fixation of Ankle Fractures With a Syndesmotic Injury.

Authors:  Steven M Cherney; Jacob A Haynes; Amanda G Spraggs-Hughes; Christopher M McAndrew; William M Ricci; Michael J Gardner
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.512

4.  A comprehensive analysis of patients with malreduced ankle fractures undergoing re-operation.

Authors:  Mikko T Ovaska; Tatu J Mäkinen; Rami Madanat; Veikko Kiljunen; Jan Lindahl
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  The predictive value of MRI in the syndesmotic instability of ankle fracture.

Authors:  Young Hwan Park; Min A Yoon; Won Seok Choi; Gi Won Choi; Suk Joo Hong; Hak Jun Kim
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Value of Ultrasound for Stability Assessment of Isolated Lateral Malleolar Fractures Compared to Stress Radiography and Arthroscopy.

Authors:  Hyong Nyun Kim; Seungmin Jeong; Young Uk Park
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2020-11-18

7.  Syndesmotic stabilization in pronation external rotation ankle fractures.

Authors:  Michel P J van den Bekerom; Daniel Haverkamp; Gino M M J Kerkhoffs; C Niek van Dijk
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-04-02       Impact factor: 4.176

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.