Literature DB >> 14742600

The use of evoked potentials for clinical correlation and surgical outcome in cervical spondylotic myelopathy with intramedullary high signal intensity on MRI.

R K Lyu1, L M Tang, C J Chen, C M Chen, H S Chang, Y R Wu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the use of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) for clinical significance and surgical outcome in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) with intramedullary high signal intensity on T2 weighted MRI.
METHODS: Forty nine patients were scored according to the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score for cervical myelopathy. MEP and SEP studies were performed and the results were categorised as normal or abnormal. Thirty nine patients who had received surgical decompression were re-evaluated after 6 months. Surgical outcome was represented by the recovery ratio of the JOA score.
RESULTS: Abnormal MEPs were observed in 44 patients (arm: 43; leg: 30). Abnormal SEPs were found in 32 patients: (median: 24; tibial: 23). Patients with abnormal SEPs had a worse JOA score than those with normal SEPs. Thirty nine patients received surgical treatment. Patients younger than 55 had better recovery ratios than those who were 55 or older (p = 0.005, two sample Student's t test). Patients with normal median SEPs also had better recovery ratios than those with abnormal median SEPs (p = 0.007, two sample Student's t test). Among median SEP variables, only N9-20 was significantly associated with recovery ratio (p = 0.016, stepwise linear regression), with age factor controlled (p = 0.025, stepwise linear regression).
CONCLUSION: Arm MEP was the most sensitive EP test for detecting myelopathy in patients with chronic CSM. Median and tibial SEPs correlated well with the severity of myelopathy while normal median SEPs correlated with good surgical outcome. Among median SEP variables, only N9-20 correlated with surgical outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14742600      PMCID: PMC1738907     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry        ISSN: 0022-3050            Impact factor:   10.154


  27 in total

1.  Intramedullary high signal intensity on T2-weighted MR images in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: prediction of prognosis with type of intensity.

Authors:  C J Chen; R K Lyu; S T Lee; Y C Wong; L J Wang
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  NATURAL HISTORY AND PROGNOSIS OF CERVICAL SPONDYLOSIS.

Authors:  F LEES; J W TURNER
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1963-12-28

3.  Relationship between residual hindlimb-assisted locomotion and surviving axons after incomplete spinal cord injuries.

Authors:  E Eidelberg; D Straehley; R Erspamer; C J Watkins
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1977-08       Impact factor: 5.330

4.  The pathogenesis of the spinal cord disorder associated with cervical spondylosis.

Authors:  S Nurick
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 13.501

5.  Isolated posterior column dysfunction: an unusual presentation of spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  P Kelkar; M A Ross; T Yamada
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  2000-08

6.  Causes of neurologic deterioration following surgical treatment of cervical myelopathy.

Authors:  K Yonenobu; K Okada; T Fuji; K Fujiwara; K Yamashita; K Ono
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Somatosensory evoked potentials in cervical spondylosis. Correlation of median, ulnar and posterior tibial nerve responses with clinical and radiological findings.

Authors:  Y L Yu; S J Jones
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  Operative results and postoperative progression of ossification among patients with ossification of cervical posterior longitudinal ligament.

Authors:  K Hirabayashi; J Miyakawa; K Satomi; T Maruyama; K Wakano
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1981 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Somatosensory conduction times and peripheral, cervical and cortical evoked potentials in patients with cervical spondylosis.

Authors:  T Ganes
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 10.154

10.  Examination of motor function in lesions of the spinal cord by stimulation of the motor cortex.

Authors:  P D Thompson; J P Dick; P Asselman; G B Griffin; B L Day; J C Rothwell; M P Sheehy; C D Marsden
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 10.422

View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  Predictors of outcome in patients with degenerative cervical spondylotic myelopathy undergoing surgical treatment: results of a systematic review.

Authors:  Lindsay A Tetreault; Alina Karpova; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  The contribution of neurophysiology in the diagnosis and management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a review.

Authors:  R Nardone; Y Höller; F Brigo; V N Frey; P Lochner; S Leis; S Golaszewski; E Trinka
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 2.772

Review 3.  Application of magnetic resonance imaging in cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Chuan Zhang; Sushant K Das; Dong-Jun Yang; Han-Feng Yang
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2014-10-28

4.  The role of DTI in early detection of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a preliminary study with 3-T MRI.

Authors:  Batuhan Kara; Azim Celik; Selhan Karadereler; Levent Ulusoy; Kursat Ganiyusufoglu; Levent Onat; Ayhan Mutlu; Ibrahim Ornek; Mustafa Sirvanci; Azmi Hamzaoglu
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 5.  [Diagnostics and conservative treatment of cervical and lumbar spinal stenosis].

Authors:  A Hug; S Hähnel; N Weidner
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.214

6.  Evaluation of cervical spondylotic myelopathy using somatosensory-evoked potentials.

Authors:  Yuichiro Morishita; Shinichi Hida; Masatoshi Naito; Ushio Matsushima
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2005-08-18       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Motor conduction measurement in myelopathy hand.

Authors:  Ryoichi Shibuya; Eiji Wada; Motoki Iwasaki; Kazuo Yonenobu; Hideki Yoshikawa
Journal:  Funct Neurol       Date:  2014 Jul-Sep

8.  Analysis of five specific scores for cervical spondylogenic myelopathy.

Authors:  Hans-Ekkehart Vitzthum; Kristina Dalitz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-10-06       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Fractional anisotropy to quantify cervical spondylotic myelopathy severity.

Authors:  Rory K Murphy; Peng Sun; Rowland H Han; Kim J Griffin; Joanne Wagner; Chester K Yarbrough; Neill M Wright; Ian G Dorward; K Daniel Riew; Michael P Kelly; Paul Santiago; Lukas P Zebala; Kathryn Trinkaus; Wilson Z Ray; Sheng-Kwei Song
Journal:  J Neurosurg Sci       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex correlates with objective clinical measures in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Marcus D Mazur; Andrea White; Sara McEvoy; Erica F Bisson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2014-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.